User talk:KanaT1990

KanaT1990, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi KanaT1990! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:08, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Fatal Attraction, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 17:24, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Nikola Tesla, you may be blocked from editing without further warnings. Thank you, - FlightTime (open channel) 16:31, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

I see that you added category "Category:People with narcissistic personality disorder" to Andrew Bolt and Sam Newman. These are BLPs. You are causing other editors to spend time cleaning up after your psychiatric diagnoses. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 14:17, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Serbian futurologists

A tag has been placed on Category:Serbian futurologists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:32, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Overcategorization

Please read Overcategorization and Wikipedia:Overcategorization before you continue adding so many categories to articles. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 17:18, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Mysteries category

I have reverted your addition of Category:Mysteries to pages on my watchlist because our article categorization guidelines call for us to use the most specific category possible (with the exception of "distinguished subcategories", which doesn't apply here.

"Mysteries" has as a subcategory Category:Unexplained disappearances, which in turn has Category:Missing persons as a subcategory. That subcategory is further divided into cases by country and decade, into which the Sodder and Joan Risch (as well as all our other articles about notable missing-person cases) are categorized. Therefore you don't need to add that top-level category.

With this in mind, it would be beneficial to your reputation here if you went back over all your recent edits and reverted that change anywhere you made it. If you continue to just do this and edit war to keep this, you are risking getting blocked. Daniel Case (talk) 17:22, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

KanaT1990, please stop repeatedly adding redundant categories immediately. This has already been explained to you by Daniel Case and others. Your editing is WP:DISRUPTIVE. Thank you. – Wallyfromdilbert (talk) 21:31, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sam Harris. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 16:15, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

KanaT1990 (talk) 16:18, 4 October 2019 (UTC)How so? I was editing. Don't understand, sorry.

You are adding large numbers of categories to many articles. Many of these categories are unsupported by the articles, which is original research. Many of the are general categories, where a more specific sub-category is already on the article. You have been warned about this multiple times by multiple editors already. It is disruptive. Stop doing it. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 16:21, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)