User talk:Kamiya Khurana

Kamiya Khurana, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Kamiya Khurana! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Disruptive editing at Naagin

If you make this change again, without achieving consensus to do so via discussion on the talk page, I will have to block your account. You've made this change at least three times, never with an explanation, and the prose in the article seems to suggest Bijlani did appear in S2. Discuss, please. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:06, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sources in biographies

Hello, I'm Ponyo. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Adaa Khan, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:41, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're still adding unsourced material to biography articles. Our policy regarding the editing of biography articles is very clear - if you want to add material please ensure it is accompanied by a reliable source.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 15:41, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Faisal Khan (actor born 1998). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 09:14, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 11:56, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For this. Discuss these changes on the article's talk page, please. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 11:56, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diffs: [1][2] Adding proper references is one of the most important things you can do if you edit at Wikipedia. All unsourced content is at risk of being removed. Why work hard only to have your edits reverted? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 10:10, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ravensfire. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Teejay Sidhu, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 20:28, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:49, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:52, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 23:52, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I have reset your block as you are evading your block using this account. --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:59, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:49, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You apparently don't understand that unsourced content is problematic. Here, you add unsourced content. Here you add an unsourced birthdate for a living person, which is a no-no, because it potentially violates their privacy. And Here you change the title of an award, bringing it out of conformity with the actual name of the award. I don't get the sense that you understand why any of these things are problematic, so you've been blocked to protect the encyclopedia from damage. If you want to be unblocked, you will need to convince a reviewing administrator that you understand what you've been blocked for. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:52, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]