User talk:Kamikaze2017

User talk:FuzhouneseMinpride

Hello Kamikaze. A few things. First of all, you placed a notification on the user page, not the user talk page, so I had to delete that page. Second, there is no section on ANI about this user. Third, you should really, really, discuss things with the user before you go to one of the noticeboards. Fourth, it is a good idea to try and de-escalate first. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 00:43, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Subei people. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. nihlus kryik (talk) 01:23, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

I realise you may be planning to continue working on this, but can you add sources to Nantong Metro as soon as possible? It is likely to be tagged for deletion as it stands. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 07:28, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jianghuai people for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jianghuai people is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jianghuai people until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

日期20220626 (talk) 04:39, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Controversy over study buddies for international students in China

The article Controversy over study buddies for international students in China has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not an encyclopedic topic, just a one-off news event. Does not meet WP:EVENT or WP:NOTNEWS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]