User talk:Kalamiyat

aspersions about other editors

Im not going to say anything anywhere else, as I do think you should be allowed to edit, but please dont make comments about others motives or biases. Just stick to the content. Take care, nableezy - 16:12, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea who you are and what you want. Kalamiyat (talk) 05:51, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Really? All right, we'll see. But if I might provide a tip for you. It is very difficult to change certain aspects of ones writing style, such as using italics when quoting small sections of text and using blockquotes when quoting larger ones, or how we cite sources in a talk page. You should work on that. nableezy - 06:14, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are channeling User Drork.[1] I hope you don't experience the usual unpleasant side effects. Just look up my old answers to all of your questions. harlan (talk) 16:34, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what you mean. I saw some posts by a user called Drork, but I don't know who he is. Basically, I think he's right. Other than that - read my posts to you. Don't send me back and forth. You have all the answer you need in the posts I wrote myself. Don't try to divert the subject to personal issues. Kalamiyat (talk) 18:13, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care who you are. You are violating WP:SOAP and WP:NPA big time, and I'll delete your remarks from now on when they stray off the article content in that regard. harlan (talk) 19:04, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me?? I am violating what? Who are you Mr. Wilkerson and how dare you accuse me of anything? How dare you tell me to stay away from an article? Kalamiyat (talk) 21:02, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Kalamiyat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page All-Palestine Government have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! nsaum75^{¡שיחת!‎} 06:27, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Drork for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. nableezy - 21:34, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]