User talk:Kajitak
|
Your draft article, User:Kajitak/sandbox/Kajitak
[edit]Hello, Kajitak. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox/Kajitak".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 22:52, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
April 2023
[edit]You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Japanese Surrendered Personnel . This is in reference to your repeated addition of claims to this article that plainly are not supported by the sources. You will be blocked if this vandalism continues. Nick-D (talk) 09:40, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
- Understood your warning, as per your order I'll seek not to let this happen again Kajitak (talk) 12:15, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
About 24/04/2023
[edit]Frankly I have strong doubts that s/he've surely checked all the sources I've shown in editing the article refered above in the original at this short time, before calling my edits "weird" and "not supported by all sources“.
I could and should have presented more JSP's forced labor materials written in Japanese, but they would be deleted as false or unsubstantiated. Above all I can't touch that article anymore.
In any case I'm just a wikipedian and I can't go against the administrator.
Edited: These repetitions may have led to warnings, but at least I never claimed in my edits what didn't say in the sources in my recognition. Need to read them again (Memo to myself) Kajitak (talk) 03:55, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- 「アーロン収容所」会田、1962
- 「収容所のロビンソンクルーソー」井上、1981
- 「労苦体験日記」平和祈念展示資料館
- 「日本降伏後における南方軍の復員過程」増田、2013
- 「南方からの帰還」増田、2019
- Sources should be reread at first
- These should be verifiable. The last one mentions to Dutch and US internment but I can't do anything if they say that Japanese documents can't be trusted Kajitak (talk) 06:07, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
- Seeking these literature pretty seriously but think about it addings based on the Japanese sources has almost been erased. No matter what I retouch anything other than gentlemanly writings of English book will be deleted from the article. Well that's what freedom is Kajitak (talk) 03:36, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
About 15/05/2023
[edit]I would like to re-edit the article about Ultranationalism and LDP, but if I bring out Japanese materials it will be judged as vandalism. What was even more surprising was that I could not immediately find an article that positioned religious nationalist groups outside of Japan as ultranationalists, which I was trying to use as an example. While Nippon Kaigi is an ultranats lobby group and the LDP is influenced by them, similarly extreme and large foreign ideological groups seem to be just nationalists Kajitak (talk) 09:08, 15 May 2023 (UTC)