User talk:Kaiserble

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, some content is controversial and should be discussed with other editors before being posted. At least one of your edits, such as the one you made to Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, appears to have gone against established consensus and has been reverted. Please check the article's talk page for discussion about this topic with other editors. If you wish, you can open or continue the discussion there to help establish consensus for your edits. Be sure to check the welcome page to learn more about how Wikipedia operates, and feel free to ask any questions. Thank you. Beagel (talk) 05:54, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Gwangju. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Shadowjams (talk) 10:07, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Euryalus (talk) 09:42, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stop edit-warring

sigh* the other guy just got a week's block. You want one, too? Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 01:51, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hel-O-ooo? What are you doing? Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 01:58, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't want that. but seoulite, he is vandal. Kaiserble (talk) 02:01, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Kaiserble_is_back <Please respond Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 02:01, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seoulite stick to his outdated sense. In the past, Daegu was no.3 cities, but not now. If you can read korean article, please read this.

http://news.naver.com/main/read.nhn?mode=LSD&mid=sec&sid1=100&oid=003&aid=0002336747 // at the government offices. Kaiserble (talk) 04:12, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the point: you were edit-warring, plain and simple. You were blocked for it, plain and simple. You continued, plain and simple. That's all that matters. Should you decide to continue, I will report you. End of story. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 04:17, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nothing to complain of past blocked. 04:12, 27 January 2010←It wasn't to express regret. I said only my reason for edit. Kaiserble (talk) 04:22, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

Hi. When you recently edited Tiger Cub Economies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page N-11 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Regional powers 2012 updated.png

Hi, I notice you created a map with regional powers. From where did you get that map? Do you have a source?

Just wondering, why Spain is not included here? Spain is a regional power in southwestern Europe (i.e. Iberian Peninsula) and northwestern Africa, it is the 12th largest economy in the world, the 2th largest economy in the Mediterranean basin, after Italy, the 1st investor in Latin America, mediator in the Western Sahara dispute (Madrid Accords), etc.

By the time you correct it, I will replace your map with File:Powers in international relations.png

Regional powers in Europe

Germany (great power)
France (great power)
Russia (great power)
United Kingdom (great power)

Eastern Europe

Poland (middle power)
Ukraine

Southern Europe, plus Minor Asia

Italy (middle power)
Spain (middle power)
Turkey (middle power)

Disambiguation link notification for October 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Four Asian Tigers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DAC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited China–Japan–South Korea trilateral summit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EAS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kaiserble. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kaiserble. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]