User talk:Kaileonard

August 2012

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kim Jong-un, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Ben Ben (talk) 17:52, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Much of the information we have in our articles come from interviews of refugees from North Korea, so often the information has a long time lag. For example, it is unknown if North Korea continues to perform forced abortions on women suspect of being pregnant by Chinese fathers. Kim Jong-un, of course, did not order this practice; it is not known if his father did, or was even aware of it. So, of course, it is unfair to have information implying that forced abortion is current practice or that Kim Jong-un supports the policy, knows of it, or has the power to change it. However our source is reasonably good. What is needed is reliable information that was recently gathered. User:Fred Bauder Talk 17:59, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Again, don't delete an entire, sourced section without discussing and obtaining consensus on the article's talk page. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:00, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

We are willing to discuss these issues, but please do it on the talk page of the article. User:Fred Bauder Talk 18:29, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Kim-jong-un-holding-a-straw-hat-and-his-wife-in-north-korea.jpeg

What is the origin and copyright license of File:Kim-jong-un-holding-a-straw-hat-and-his-wife-in-north-korea.jpeg? Did you take this picture yourself? User:Fred Bauder Talk 17:53, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Kim Jong-un, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Ben Ben (talk) 18:11, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Kim Jong-un shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. While you may disagree with the inclusion and challenge the sources, you cannot continue to remove without discussion on the talk page when you have been reverted several times. MASEM (t) 18:12, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Kim Jong-un, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Adding possible POV statements, especially unsourced ones, to articles as potentially controversial as this one, and then marking the edit summary as minor is a huge faux pas. Just a heads-up, in the event you didn't realize you were making a mistake. Cheers. Zaldax (talk) 18:15, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Kaileonard. You have new messages at ItsZippy's talk page.
Message added 18:42, 10 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 18:42, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:48, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Unsourced information

This edit requires citation of sources. By the way, the new economic policy was announced on June 28, see N.K. abandoning central planning, rationing: report, but it is uncertain how, and whether, it is being put into effect. One person's opinion about economic conditions is not that notable, although the reports of the Japanese chef were closely analyzed, as was the apparent appearance of a Dior handbag on the arm of Kim Jong-un's wife. User:Fred Bauder Talk 19:05, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Kim Jong-un shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Black Kite (talk) 19:06, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

I'm not sure if you are aware, but when material is contentious (ie, someone disagrees), you need to provide sources in the edit. Knowing about them yourself is not enough; you must reference them in the article, otherwise people are free to remove what you've written. I hope that helps. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 19:09, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

If you wish to add this to the article (and evidently you do), please take it to the talk page, which can be found here. We'd be happy to discuss it there, but I think it should be fairly clear by now that it won't make it into the article if you just keep adding it the same way every time. Cheers, Zaldax (talk) 19:19, 10 August 2012 (UTC)