Jump to content

User talk:Kailash29792/Archive 54

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 50←Archive 52Archive 53Archive 54Archive 55Archive 56→Archive 60

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aaram Vetrumai (June 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ravenswing was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The article remains unimproved from the barebones previous submission; all I can see is that already-extant references were filled in a bit.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Ravenswing 15:20, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Kailash29792! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ravenswing 15:20, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Thalapathy 68

According to this report, Thalapathy 68 is going to be Vijay's last film before he enters politics. I know Pinkvilla is not a reliable source for BO but what is your opinion? 103.179.230.68 (talk) 15:43, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

It clearly says T68 is "rumoured" to be Vijay's last. So ignore it. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:53, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Pinkvilla

Don't you intend to comment on that pinkvilla discussion anymore? Cinephile4ever 04:56, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

I gave my verdict, that it can be used for general info. Not sensitive/subject-to-change or exceptional claims. What more to say? Kailash29792 (talk) 05:07, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Ok thanks Cinephile4ever 05:20, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
But I thought you will comment on that user Archer1234's comment saying mistakes without editorial oversight would make it unreliable based on that specific article of the box office of Vikram film. Because he himself is yet to comment on that. If you feel like commenting on that, you can. Thanks. Cinephile4ever 05:23, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I just saw your latest comment in that discussion from the edit history page. I missed it because you had replied before the section "Technical fact finding". Would you please consider moving it to the last so it can be seen as your latest comment by other users too. Thanks. Cinephile4ever 06:45, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Dear Kailash29792! Can you find newspaper ads or poster of Kavithai Paada Neramillai 1987? Thank you! --92.100.208.128 (talk) 13:09, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nainika (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Has she been in any other notable films?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 15:04, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Kadhalar Dhinam

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kadhalar Dhinam, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:16, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Kadhal Mannan

Does your book The Best of Tamil Cinema, 1931 to 2010: 1977–2010 say anything about this film? DareshMohan (talk) 14:10, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

No. Do you have access to the pages for future use? Kailash29792 (talk) 14:16, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Yes although I do not usually edit older film articles. DareshMohan (talk) 14:37, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Star Vijay.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Star Vijay.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Kungumam (magazine)

Do you own issues any of these? They wrote film reviews during the 2000s. DareshMohan (talk) 16:12, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Sadly no. My family's more into Vikatan and Kumudam. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:26, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Vijayakanth filmography

Can you please help me flip this? Also, don't ping IP requests to me, not interested. DareshMohan (talk) 11:18, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanks bro. Do you or @DaxServer: know any table experts that can flip the order of films in years 1980-1999. The order has been reversed and is only correct for films in 1979 and 2000-2015. DareshMohan (talk) 06:15, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Word of advice?

The director of Sabari (2023 film) left me a message on my talk page (User_talk:DareshMohan#Sabari_(2023_film)). Don't want to feel threatened by it but hate how the power that these people can have. Pretty sure that actors have managers that manage their wiki, etc. DareshMohan (talk) 05:49, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Just ignore him. Or take this to the noticeboard. Read WP:COI on how to deal with this. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:17, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Article maybe

Similar to Aparna Das, maybe you would be interested in creating an ariticle for Leo actress Santhi Mayadevi a.k.a. Santhi Priya? Not sure if she is notable but she used to be a lawyer and starred in three Malayalam films. DareshMohan (talk) 17:10, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Kaathala Kaathala

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kaathala Kaathala, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:23, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Jolly (film)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jolly (film), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:52, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Nowrunning

I think this source may be good for reviews Screen writer Unni R Nair also writes there. DareshMohan (talk) 20:13, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

I never disputed it. Kailash29792 (talk) 02:56, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Watermark removed

File:Priyam 2000 poster.jpg The watermark is removed from this image.Manick22 (talk) 07:23, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Chandralekha (1948 film) scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 15 August 2023. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 15, 2023, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/August 2023. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 20:52, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

I remember when this passed. Well deserved, my friend. Congrats on the TFA.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 11:31, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Can you save this. I kinda need it. DareshMohan (talk) 02:54, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

This it? Kailash29792 (talk) 03:40, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
U a legend. DareshMohan (talk) 04:33, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Your recent prod

Hello Kailash29792,

Just letting you know I've made a Redirect-page of one you had just prodded. Hope this will seem fair to you. Best, -MY, OH MY! (mushy yank) 09:17, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Did not find that film in zamin ryot archives. hope u are checking this. Film reviews are on page 9. Google translate app in phone can translate it. DareshMohan (talk) 17:49, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

"Nenjam Marappathillai (unreleased film)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Nenjam Marappathillai (unreleased film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 13 § Nenjam Marappathillai (unreleased film) until a consensus is reached. 2pou (talk) 19:16, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

"The Little Mermaid (upcoming Disney film)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect The Little Mermaid (upcoming Disney film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 13 § The Little Mermaid (upcoming Disney film) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:22, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Haraa film poster.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Haraa film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:21, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Lead section

Can you undo this edit? Leo is a very notable film and having a long lead section may be a good thing like in the case of RRR (film), Kanguva and Master (2021 film). 103.179.231.65 (talk) 15:56, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm travelling and don't have desktop access. Kailash29792 (talk) 18:44, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Alright, no problem. Take your time. If you can or cannot do the aforementioned, I am fine with it. By undoing it, I actually meant that if you could copy the source code of the removed part and paste in in the current version. 103.179.231.65 (talk) 14:55, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Discovery

I know why there is not much English sources in Telugu. There is not any major English-language newspaper company based in Telugu region like The Hindu is in Chennai. Deccan Chronicle doesn't do many film reviews. DareshMohan (talk) 05:39, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Jailer (film)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jailer (film), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:31, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
  • On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Remake

Per User_talk:Kailash29792/Archive_53#Remake. Friends (2016) plot: he comes to know that the love of his life is his best friend’s sister [1] Isn't it like Kannedhirey Thondrinal? @Srivin: DareshMohan (talk) 19:11, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

yes its similar to it. Srivin (talk) 09:55, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
@Kailash29792: Please safeguard it on the article. On the trailer, these comments [2] [3]. Try to see if you can find a better source. DareshMohan (talk) 18:22, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Cast

This. He is in Naa Ready, which is a part of the film. [4] [5] [6] (leftmost) DareshMohan (talk) 19:17, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Cast

Is Sadhu Kokila in Jailer? [7]. Please give some clarity (it is unclear). Name not listed here. @Kataariveera: DareshMohan (talk) 21:44, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

There is no clarity. It is a speculation that Sadhu Kokila maybe part of the movie - either a small role or the Kannada version will be partly reshot with Sadhu reprising Yogi Babu role. Will have to wait until trailer or release. Kataariveera (talk) 07:29, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Watch the beginning of the trailer slowly at 0.5 speed. The cast members are there including Nagendra Babu at 6 seconds. DareshMohan (talk) 19:50, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Added Redin Kingsley to the cast because of the plethora of sources and the fact that he is close friend of Nelson. DareshMohan (talk) 19:33, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Control copyright icon Hello Kailash29792! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Avan Pithana?, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.thehindu.com/features/cinema/Avan-Pithana-1966/article14568245.ece, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Avan Pithana? saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! SmileySnail (talk) 21:22, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

If you detect old potential copyvio content that I cannot remember, I hope you inform Moneytrees since they seem an expert at rewriting. I was briefly blocked in 2019 for copyvio issues and have since been cautiously trying to avoid them. Kailash29792 (talk) 02:37, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
I agree that Moneytrees is good at rewriting. He rewrote the plot summary for Avan Pithana?, and I think he did a good job. After reading your message, I have since attempted to notify him directly about two other copyvios I've found - not yours, but from another user, Sangavitamilmani, who was permanently blocked a few years ago for persistent copyright violations. For the past few days, I have been looking for unaddressed copyvios in all the articles she worked on.
It started a few days ago, on the last day of the July 2023 GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive. I was trying to snag one last bonus article; articles that were tagged in August 2022 for copyediting were worth a 50% word count bonus in last month's drive. Pasavalai was in the August 2022 list, and I'm not sure exactly why I did, but I chose to attempt copyediting on Pasavalai. In doing so, I inadvertently discovered that the article had a copyvio plot summary. After addressing the copyvio issue, I had to find a different article to copyedit because there was no copyediting to do in Pasavalai. But my curiosity had been aroused, and the next day, after the copyediting drive ended, I decided to check whether the offending user from Pasavalai had a history of copyvios. I found several copyvio warnings and a block notice at User talk:Sangavitamilmani, and the rest is history.
I am glad to know that you learn from your mistakes and listen to what others tell you. Some people, like Sangavitamilmani, unfortunately do not, at least not before it is too late. SmileySnail (talk) 20:20, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi @SmileySnail, thanks for your removals of copyvio here. You might be interested in Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210410, which is a overview of Sangavitamilmani's edits. I'll note that a reword isn't always necessary; there's more merit to rewriting a close paraphrase (like Kailash29792's older edits) than spending time rewriting mostly unedited pastes (Sangavitamilmani's edits). Additionally, film articles don't require plot summaries, it's fine to leave them without one. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 21:20, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi, Moneytrees. That CCI report is very interesting and helpful, and I will keep it open in a browser tab as I proceed with cleaning up Sangavitamilmani's copyvio mess. The rest of your advice is also helpful, and I will be sure to remember it.
About plot summaries in film articles, I will say that although they are not necessary, I think they are very nice to have. However, after reading your reply, I read the Wikipedia how-to page on writing plot summaries, and this section - Wikipedia:How to write a plot summary#Citations seems to be saying that writing plot summaries based solely on reading someone else's summary, without having yourself watched/read the work in question, is not a good practice. I will keep that, plus your advice in mind as I proceed with my work, and I thank you for the good work you do here. SmileySnail (talk) 23:56, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Primary topic - name - clarity

Is Sunil (actor) the Wikipedia:Primary topic? There is Sunil (Kannada actor), which has less views. So no need to move Sunil (actor) to Sunil (Telugu actor)?

Same issue with Dhool and Dhool (2011 film) (has very less views). DareshMohan (talk) 23:02, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Try it for Sunil. As for Dhool, let it be since the Tamil film is far better known. Kailash29792 (talk) 02:54, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Haraa film poster.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Haraa film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Poster

Please add poster to Duniya (2007 film). The film is a HUGE box office success, so sad that there is no poster. DareshMohan (talk) 19:56, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ramu (1966 film)

The article Ramu (1966 film) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Ramu (1966 film) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kting97 -- Kting97 (talk) 14:42, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Work

Nice work in old Tamil films, the quality of Wikipedia improved thanks to you. DareshMohan (talk) 06:37, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Box office

Hi, as you must be well aware, the box office reporting for Indian films is so overwhelming and pathetic. I mean there can be more than 20 box office estimates from reliable sources for the same film. Also, the difference between the lowest and highest estimates are often huge for many films, and sometimes so ridiculous. Take for example, I found new sources for lower estimates for films Bajrangi Bhaijaan and 2.0 recently, and now the range of collection for these films is 631 to 969 crores and 519 to 800 crores respectively. The difference is more than 330 crores for the former which just sounds so ridiculous. But as per the Indian cinema task force page it says giving range is preferable. For almost all American films, they only give a single box office collection as per Box Office Mojo. Can't we find any one reliable source for Indian films too or can't we give the highest estimate only or any other better solution because this is really overwhelming. What's your opinion about this? Cinephile4ever 13:48, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Just go with what the sources say. The most reputed ones give the most accurate info, better to stick to them. But TOI frequently falters, and beware of WP:TOI. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:49, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ramu (1966 film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ramu (1966 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 06:41, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Ramu is one of the main characters, why is it considered as supporting (due to credits order)? DareshMohan (talk) 05:56, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Yes. How to resolve this dilemma? Hope you can resolve his queries when I can't. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:58, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Nelson

In this source Nelson says about his plan to direct Beast, Doctor and Kolamaavu Kokila film's sequels. Is it required to add this in respective articles? NaanReady (talk) 13:37, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Yes, please add right away. You can also add to Nelson's article, not the filmography section (until they're filming). Kailash29792 (talk) 13:43, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Don't archive box office sources in Jailer film article

Hi, don't rescue sources relating to box office figures in the Jailer film article because they will be replaced on a daily basis till the end of the film's theatrical run. Cinephile4ever 14:58, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Sure. But I thought only Pinkvilla does that? Please remove the undesired archives add to the desired refs. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:08, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Pinkvilla does what? And what add to desired refs mean? Cinephile4ever 15:15, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Changing content in their articles post publication, akin to George Lucas making frequent changes to the Star Wars films. I meant add this template {{cbignore}} to sources, but sorry I didn't put it in brackets. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:20, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

chandralekha

hello, Kailash29792! i had two quick questions regarding this article and the associated blurb.

  • i am unclear as to how the title of the novel by reynolds should be presented. the blurb uses "Robert Macaire: or, The French bandit in England", as does the article lead. however, the article body presents the title as "Robert Macaire, or the French Bandit in England". the article on the fictional character presents it in yet another way, referring to the novel as "Robert Macaire; or, The French Bandit in England".
    i am not sure if there is a standard on wikipedia regarding how works titled like this should be presented, but i know that the article on the novel frankenstein presents its title as "Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus", and i had figured that, if there was a standard, this presentation would probably be following it. this style is also used in the third example i mentioned above, and appears to be used in this image of what appears to be a copy of the title page of the novel (though i don't know for sure, as the title page uses all caps). what are your thoughts regarding how the title should be presented in the blurb?
  • Ravenpuff and i were having a discussion regarding whether the picture featured in the blurb is an image of a poster or not. do you happen to be aware of whether or not it is? i admittedly am unable to read tamil myself, while i know that you have stated on your userpage that you are from a tamil-speaking family, so i am hoping that the text may reveal some clues if the rest of the image does not make it clear to you.

dying (talk) 04:53, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

It really is an early production teaser poster. As for the Macaire text, go with the format used by Frankenstein. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:04, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
oh, interesting! i would not have guessed that it was a teaser poster. anyway, done. thanks for addressing these issues! dying (talk) 05:17, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Thank you today for the araticle, introduced (in 2014)): "I intend to take this article about a 1948 mega-budget Indian film to featured status because of its historical significance in Indian cinema."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:46, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Message

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1170555671

Vanthu allitu po mayire @Kailash29792

(45.134.225.30 (talk) 08:36, 16 August 2023 (UTC))

Precious anniversary

Precious
Four years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:37, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Jawan (soundtrack)

Could you please make Jawan (soundtrack). 103.70.199.9 (talk) 16:35, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Not much into Bollywood these days. Kailash29792 (talk) 23:32, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Work

Do you need help on Ramu (1966 film)? I need help on Payanam (2011 film). DareshMohan (talk) 23:27, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

I'll do what I can on Payanam. You please take care of Ramu. Kailash29792 (talk) 23:32, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
I did what I could. Any advice for GA's in general? DareshMohan (talk) 06:58, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kailash29792/Archive_54&oldid=1174400369"