User talk:Kailash29792/Archive 17
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 |
Jessica Jones image
Why did you upload the exact same thing and replace it? There was no need, and now the original file with its history of the previous logos has been deleted and that needs to be restored. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:07, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
- Because that image was PNG, and you cannot overwrite a file of a different extension. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:11, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
- But it was the exact same image you just upload. So I still fail to see the need to do so or why you did. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:20, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
- Picture clarity varies. In almost every server I open, PNG images appear blurry. I think they should best be used when the image has transparency. Kailash29792 (talk) 17:19, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
- But it was the exact same image you just upload. So I still fail to see the need to do so or why you did. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:20, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Aww...
C'mon, Kailash... [1] Wikipedia needs good, cool-headed editors! Don't yield to the dark side! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:26, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
- I was being sarcastic then. It was in no intended manner a personal attack. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:48, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
CSD declined for Adaptations of Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde
Hey Kailash, I contested/declined the CSD tag you placed on Adaptations of Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde because it was moved from this title to the current one (with periods) five years ago. The move therefore does not seem uncontroversial. Best, Airplaneman ✈ 16:49, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Deadpool (film)
- added a link pointing to Colossus
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Hey! again
Would you like to take a look here. It's been 10 days and still not a single comment. Hope you can help.—Prashant 16:41, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Historical exchange rate
One random website gives this: http://www.paper-dragon.com/1939/exchange.html. I do not know how reliable is that website. In old film related articles, we've used Statistical Abstract of the United States of that year or the following year as a source for exchange rate. Please see, for example, Explanatory Notes (note a) in Mother India, which mentions the exchange rate in 1957.--Dwaipayan (talk) 14:20, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- Dwaipayanc, the credibility of that site is questionable. Hence, I have used this one. Its' credibility may also be questioned, but the "about" page reads that the site's mission is to "make available to the public the highest quality and most reliable historical data on important economic aggregates, with particular emphasis on "nominal (current-price) measures, as well as real (constant-price) measures." Does it look credible to you? Kailash29792 (talk) 08:29, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
- difficult to say. One thing in favor of the Measuring Worth website is their list of advisors, which contains names of scholars from reputed universities. I guess it's ok for now.--Dwaipayan (talk) 04:00, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Your reversion at Fantastic Four (2015 film)
Hello:
You reverted (twice) the addition of the below-expectation performance of the Fantastic Four movie leading to 20th Century Fox reconsidering its sequel. The second time, you noted, "As per http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/box-office-fantastic-four-flops-814123, the sequel is still happening"
That's not at all what that link suggests -- in fact, it supports my addition that Fox is re-considering its options, vis-a-vis its other Marvel properties in development:
- "No one's sure what the film's start means for the sequel, which is already dated for June 2017.
- "While we're disappointed, we remain committed to these characters and we have a lot to look forward to in our Marvel universe," said Fox domestic distribution chief Chris Aronson, declining to comment specifically on Fantastic Four 2.
- There's been speculation that Fox could incorporate the Fantastic Four characters into the X-Men series."
--HidariMigi (talk) 14:53, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- Add what you want, but no speculation or rumours please. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:16, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- Discussion replicated at Talk:Fantastic Four (2015 film) for further input. --HidariMigi (talk) 17:24, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Shahid Kapoor filmography
The nominator (Krimuk90) seem to have retired abruptly. If you get some time, could you please take a look at the FL here. - Vivvt (Talk) 08:31, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- You and Ssven2 seem to have mistaken my request. I would like you to review the FLC. I would provide the fixes, if required. - Vivvt (Talk) 10:44, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maalavika Manoj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hillsong. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
TOI article on Kaildas heroine
This might interest you. Probably can have a place in the production and reception sections. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 08:47, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you indeed! The article Kalidas also has been somewhat revamped with this new info, so please re-evaluate it if necessary. And do please try and attract more reviewers and copyeditors to Kalidas' FAC like you did for Enthiran. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:10, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Pallavi Anupallavi (1989).jpg
![⚠](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/34/Ambox_warning_blue.svg/35px-Ambox_warning_blue.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Pallavi Anupallavi (1989).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:40, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Blue
Hey Kailash29792! I have real doubts about the source([2]) used for Blue in this article. It is because it states that Mughal-e-Azam cost 12 cr. which is outrageously higher than any other source. Waiting for your reply. Josephjames.me (talk) 15:03, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- That is what the Indian media is notorious for; publishing unreliable and conflicting financial data. But it's best we go with what BOI says. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:19, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Okkadu
Hi Kailash. This 16 August, i could finally find a comprehensive article about this film's production after waiting for a long time in Sakshi newspaper. I have no plans to make it big, but at least make it a better one. But, is the Tamil version a xerox copy including the title? I'm unaware! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:18, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- Obviously not! That was a joke comment by me, and the makers of Ghilli obviously bought the remake rights, so any similarities between Ghilli and Okkadu is legally fine. But "Ilayathalapathy" Vijay and his films are often mocked at by audiences because most of them are very similar to each other, they are clichéd and lack originality. However, if the makers of a film buy remake rights, no-one has the right to accuse them of plagiarism. But again, the "xerox copy".comment by me was just a joke. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:30, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- I watched Tevar among the remakes of Okkadu. It was devoid of all the sensibilities the original had. I find the original more interesting because the hero is not a heroic person. Anyways, IMHO Okkadu was the first proper masala film from Mahesh (after a beautiful film like Murari) and the films of Vijay, which i saw (the last one being Jilla), were truly routine. I just wonder how Jilla was a hit in Telugu! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:50, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Box office
Hi Kailash, regarding this edit of yours, did you happen to notice my talk page comment about this? If so, I appreciate the removal of the content. Would you mind commenting if you feel inclined? No pressure, though. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:10, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Source and image review
For Kalidas, the image review can be done by either User:Nikkimaria or User:SuperMarioMan. For source review, either SNUGGUMS or Nikkimaria themselves would do it. BTW, have you managed to resolve edwininlondon's comments, bro? — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 04:41, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
- He did. Not only his, but also those of Indopug and Dwaipayanc. Only problem is that he did not mention the same at the FAC page, and they too aren't aware of the same. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:16, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Clarification w.r.t. Mayabazar edit
In this edit, you stated that penned is slang
.
However, I'd like to point out that the verb usage comes from Middle English and is, in fact, not slang (see, e.g., the entry at Wiktionary and the entry at M-W). ← scribbleink ᗧHᗣT 20:49, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Straight Outta Compton (2015 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West Coast. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
I helped resolved the comments at Kubrick's GAR and the article is now a GA! Doc's dream of getting Kubrick to beyond is partially fulfilled. Wanted to share the news with you. 😊 — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 03:31, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Youtubers Page
I was wondering if you could add Julian Solomita he is the current boyfriend of Jenna Marbles and he vlogs his life almost everyday Littleisme (talk) 03:12, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- I have no idea what you're talking about. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:01, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Indian cinema - comment requested
Hi there, this is a form letter. (Aren't you special!) Since you edit around Indian cinema articles, your comments are solicited at this discussion at the Indian cinema task force. The question is: Should box office gross totals be labeled as estimates?
Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:28, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Bhuvannalla
After reverting his edit, another editor (whom I strongly believe is a sock), Protamilian, reverted your edit as per here. Moreover, the sources he added are those before the film's release and not after. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 07:05, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- I have opened a sockpuppetry investigation case here. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:09, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Super Appu! — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 07:32, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
First FLs
BTW, List of accolades received by Enthiran and List of accolades received by Aadukalam are now FLs. My first FL successes. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 07:32, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Hey, does the previous edition cover this film? —Vensatry (ping) 15:03, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Previous edition of what? Danny's The Best of Tamil Cinema? I checked, it doesn't. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:12, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- But I remember you asking about this film. The link is here. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:29, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Do you have the pride? —Vensatry (ping) 16:44, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Nope. But you can expand Ooruku Nooruper by finding sources using this site. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:49, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
FL
Would you please take a look at this? Thanks. Krish | Talk 07:03, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Net down
- My internet's down Prashant, so it may take time. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:59, 30 August 2015 (UTC) Kailash29792 (talk) 08:59, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Hey!
I am getting sick and i think i will too soon leave here. This article was passed with no issue of neutrality. I dont want to write lenghts about it bcoz i have my studies. I wrote that article from scrap and took it to GA, unlike others who choose an already ready article and just tweak a bit and take it to GA. You can see the GA revciew. Krimuk added that review just to show Chopra was criticised and all. But dude the article never said Chopra did a meryl. So where is the neutrality? Also, the article uses only indian reviews and thats it. There is no need to add more review like other articles saying domestic and international reception.Krish | Talk 11:25, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- Perhaps you are right. But if anyone was aiming for the article to become FA, international reviews may seem necessary to help expand the article/showcase the film's significance and wide reach. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:27, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- FYI, I was/am going to start work on it for FL. I will take all my GAs to FAs and the articles will appear on their release dates on main page. The film does not have a rating on Meta and Tomatoes, but who cares. The problem is finding a negative review of the film, which i will only when i start to work on it. Also, the critical reception sys about the whole film and not performances. Well, let's see what can happen at the FL or PR.Krish | Talk 11:34, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
MY USERNAME: ManiRatnamAvargal
My username is NOT 'MANI RATNAM', but 'ManiRatnamAvargal'. The Tamil word 'Avargal' makes it a third person reference. If you still insist on a name change, do guide me through the procedure, as I am unsure whether I can manually change it myself.
I would prefer the name to be changed to 'ManiRatnamRasigan'. 'Rasigan' is again a Tamil word, which means 'FAN'. Another option is 'IndianCinemaRasigan'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ManiRatnamAvargal (talk • contribs) 10:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
ISBN Kalidas
For the ISBN of Guy's, Baskaran's and Ganesan's book, you can use the barcode on the book itself I think. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 08:07, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- Yes I will do it soon. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:08, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
This actor's biography, filmography and accolades are currently at WP:FTC here. Please post your comments (if any) there as I don't want the nomination to fail due to lack of activity. -- Frankie talk 17:10, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Baahubali Budget
Hi Kailash,you edited the budget of 'Baahubali:The Beginning' to 250 crores from 120 crores.But the page is only about the 1st part of the movie which is made of a budget of 120 crores.250 cr is budget of both films combined.So it will be appropriate to keep 120 crores.Thanks Vicky (talk) 20:07, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
This, is my first film awards list at the FLC. If interested, please leave your comments here. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:52, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
I have nominated the article for GA. I could wait for someone to pick and review that, but I want someone familiar with Bollywood to review it. You can ignore this message if you're not willing to do it Frankie talk 17:51, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
- With two exams nearing for me, I do not want to strain myself into reviews. Kailash29792 (talk) 17:53, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
16 Vayathinile
Correction Sir. Baradwaj Rangan says a musical trope from Europe was used. A trope is a signature, in this case a musical signature. That is not to be confused with an orchestra troupe. We would be spreading wrong information by saying Ilayaraja used a foreign orchestra troupe. I am a die hard fan of Maestro so do not mistake me. But Rangan speaks of a trope, not a troupe. Thanks for understanding. Saying this here since it has been added again after it has been removed. Cheers. Venkateswaran Ganesan (talk) 07:56, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Cheers. Answered in my page. I've not contacted anyone on wiki before so I'm figuring out how this messaging works. Never mind the repetition here.
Venkateswaran Ganesan (talk) 08:06, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
So you like Dirty Harry, do you, Punk? Classic! Thanks for the thanks, bro. When did you watch the film first? — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 12:30, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
I think Magnum Force is my favourite out of the Dirty Harry films! You can't get more bad ass than Clint in the 70s!♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:41, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Dr. Blofeld: In you opinion, which are your favourite Eastwood films, Doc? — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 12:50, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- I saw Dirty Harry last year. I intend to watch the entire series. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:56, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- Great! BTW, why don't you start a film list like me and Doc here? I could use some of your recommendations too!
— Ssven2 Speak 2 me 12:57, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- Wow! What an enthusiasm? Another list added to the existing four. But, are you interested in the first place Kailash? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:59, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- Nah, I'm not interested in keeping lists like this on Wiki. But I never forget the movies I watched. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:03, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- Why? Sounds like you follow WP:OR in this case, though it isn't applicable for userpages. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:08, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- Nah, I'm not interested in keeping lists like this on Wiki. But I never forget the movies I watched. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:03, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- Wow! What an enthusiasm? Another list added to the existing four. But, are you interested in the first place Kailash? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:59, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- Great! BTW, why don't you start a film list like me and Doc here? I could use some of your recommendations too!
- I saw Dirty Harry last year. I intend to watch the entire series. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:56, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
ANBE VAA, 1966, MGR Tamil movie
Sir,
I shall wish to know why you deleted my modification on the movie of MGR, ANBE VAA ( 1966 )
Thank you for answering me.
Ferdinand LACOUR.
For your information :
I am specialized on the question of MGR in France within the association France MGR Péravai,
Ferdinand LACOUR.
- Lacour ferdinand octave, the reason why I deleted your "contributions" to Anbe Vaa is, because you wrote in an extremely disruptive manner, like a man who fell on his head. Kailash29792 (talk) 18:05, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Baahubali is a Film Series
Hi Kailash. Do refer this Wikipedia article. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/List_of_film_series_with_two_entries — Preceding unsigned comment added by IndianCinemaRasigan (talk • contribs) 20:48, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:50, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- IndianCinemaRasigan, do please read WP:Cut and paste moves. Kailash29792 (talk) 20:51, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Technically, the Baahubali duology has two feature length films. And the following Wikipedia article implies, two-film franchises qualify as 'Film Series'.
https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/List_of_film_series_with_two_entries
I don't want to revert your edit again, as it may cause a misunderstanding between us. If you are convinced, please do consider naming the article as 'Baahubali (film series)'. Only if you are convinced. Let's not have a move war.IndianCinemaRasigan 20:58, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- Let's be clear on something, IndianCinemaRasigan, List of film series with two entries is a list article that contains a lot of examples of two-part film series. It is not a policy page or a Manual of Style guideline, or anything else. And very few, if any, of those articles have links to [[Movie title (film series)]] articles. You should have discussed the move first, and you should base your decisions on established community guidelines, not list articles. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:14, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
ANBE VAA, 1966, MGR Tamil movie
Sir,
I did not offend to you, thus remain courteous, they are only articles of cinema
Ferdinand Lacour
Especially that your information is erroneous !
- Please at least write in a proper, clean and mature manner. At least stop writing film names in capitals. E.g.: Anbe Vaa is correct. ANBE VAA is not. Kailash29792 (talk) 18:24, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Je ne comprends pas que vous persistiez à laisser des informations erronées sur la page wikipedia du film tamoul ANBE VAA, 1966, avec MGR... Notamment, sur la distribution artistique (le casting) du film, vous êtes complètement dans l'erreur, par exemple l'actrice T. P. Muthulakshmi n'est pas l'infirmière, mais la mère du personnage de l'actrice Sarodja Devi. Celle qui joue l'infirmière est l'actrice humoristique Madhavi ! Vérifiez avant de laisser des bêtises sur le net ! En plus je vous ai donné des lien, pour que vous puissiez vérifier par vous même ! Vous êtes là à ergoter sur des majuscules, qui au passage, ne nuisent en rien à la lecture de l'article en question, bien au contraire, dans la règle de la dactylographie, cela met en évidence l'importance d'un mot, enfin, je crois que vous êtes con à ce niveau là ! De façon, j'ai les moyen de vous localiser !
C'est toi qui fait une école de journalisme, mon gars, tu devrais tout de suite de te faire rembourser ! T'es pas fait pour ce métier, un jour, tu vas te faire démolir avec ta belle tête de vainqueur ! Surtout, ne viens en pas en France !
- Please speak English. Your edits are still non-constructive and disruptive, but if you continue to edit like this, you'll probably be blocked. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:12, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- I speak a little French. I thinks he means to say
- "I do not understand why you persist in adding/leaving erroneous information on Anbe Vaa. In particular, the artistic distribution (casting) of the film, you are completely wrong, such as the actress T. P. Muthulakshmi is not a nurse, but the mother of the character of actress Saroja Devi . The one who plays the nurse is the humorous actress Madhavi! Check before adding/leaving nonsense on the net! In addition I have given you the link for you to check it yourself! You are there to quibble with caps, which by the way, do not detract from reading the article, on the contrary, in the rule of typing, this highlights the importance of a word, finally, I believe that you are a con at this level! So I have the means to locate you!"
- He has sort of taken a potshot at you, bro. But I believe you have resolved it yourself on the article's page. Thanks for that. I looked up T. P. Muthulakshmi on google images and she does look similar to Saroja Devi's mother in the film. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 11:13, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
En quoi, le fait de compléter, je dirais même de créer la page wikipedia du film AASAI MUGAM te gêner, puisqu'il n'y avait pratiquement rien ! Je t'apporte tout sur un plateau et gratuitement, je consacre du temps pour cela, serais-tu jaloux ? Si un travail "sérieux", digne de ce nom, avait été fait en amont, on aurait pas à faire ces modifications ! Non seulement, vous êtes incapable de le faire, mais vous empêchez aussi les autres de le faire dans de bonnes conditions, ce qui est encore plus grave ! Je vous plaints les gars ! En tout cas, vous êtes loin du professionnalisme de l'auteur du site, antrukandamugam.wordpress.com, vous devriez en prendre de la graine ! Ferdinand LACOUR.
- Translation — "How, being complete, I would even create a wikipedia page of the film Aasai Mugam bother you, since there was nothing! I bring you everything on a tray and free, I spend time for this, would you be jealous? If a job "seriously," worthy of the name, had been done, we would not have to do these changes! Not only are you unable to do, but you also prevent others to do so in good conditions, which is even worse! I complained to you guys! In any case, you are far from the professionalism of the site author, antrukandamugam.wordpress.com, you should take a leaf!" — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 11:59, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
En résumé : fais correctement, dès le départ ton bouleau, comme çà, personne ne viendra redire quoique ce soit ! Et on sera quitte ! Sinon, je ne lâcherai pas le morceau, tu peux en être sûr, à n'en pas douter...
- Please write in English next time so that the user understands you. Translation again — In summary: do correctly from the start. Then no one will complain about anything! And we will leave! Otherwise, I will not give it out, you can be sure, in no doubt ... — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 12:02, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- Lacour Ferdinand Octave, La prochaine fois, s'il vous plaît écrire en anglais. (Please write in English next time.) — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 12:10, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Si, j'avais remis de l'ordre dans la bande originale du film ANBE VAA, c'est parce que, c'était d'une part, dans l'ordre de passage, dans le film et de l'autre, il manquait l'autre version, finale de la chanson intitulée Anbe Vaa qui clôture le film de MGR. Sur ce morceau, le 10ème, c'est le couple de chanteurs, T. M. Soundararajan et P. Susheela qui l'interprètent. Je vois que vous n'avez encore rien compris ! Et le fait, que j'ai écrit en Français, ne devrait pas vous poser problèmes, il y a le traducteur automatique ou votre Kailash29792 qui, apparemment, connaîtrait la langue française et puis wikipedia n'est pas qu'en anglais, à ce que je sache ! F.LACOUR
FL
Would you please take a look here. Your comments might help. Thanks.Krish | Talk 14:31, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Lacour
Hi Kailash, please remember not to get yourself caught up in an edit-war situation yourself. The Lacour situation could easily have been remedied without making so many reverts. The fact that he wasn't explaining his edits, they were contrary to normal quotation standards, that he was removing a reference without explanation, and that he was only communicating in French should have been something that AIV or ANI could have handled. I'd hate to see a good editor like you get caught up in an edit-war block. Take care, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:35, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Can you help
I created this page Balamani and got a warning on my talk page. This is the only good reference I found: http://www.thehindu.com/features/cinema/cinema-columns/blast-from-the-past-balamani-1937/article6625126.ece --Action Hero 15:22, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
- Action Hero: The article was not being tagged because of the film's lack of notability; it was tagged because you plagiarised from another source. But I'll try reworking the article to save it. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:56, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
- I didn't plagiarise. That was a general statement that came to my mind after reading the article. That website is unknown to me. This line "Balamani is a Tamil detective movie released in 1937" doesn't constitute plagiarism. If I write "Jawaharlal Nehru was the first Prime Minister of India", that bot might say I plagiarized the line from 5000 sources. I googled "Balamani 1937". --Action Hero 16:50, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hi, can you reduce the size of the picture. The article is a stub. The picture looks too big for a small article. It's impossible to find more sources of a 1937 film. As reliable non-English sources are allowed, you can find Tamil sources. Action Hero 08:05, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- You can expand the article with information from Randor Guy's article. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:11, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- Hi, can you reduce the size of the picture. The article is a stub. The picture looks too big for a small article. It's impossible to find more sources of a 1937 film. As reliable non-English sources are allowed, you can find Tamil sources. Action Hero 08:05, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- I didn't plagiarise. That was a general statement that came to my mind after reading the article. That website is unknown to me. This line "Balamani is a Tamil detective movie released in 1937" doesn't constitute plagiarism. If I write "Jawaharlal Nehru was the first Prime Minister of India", that bot might say I plagiarized the line from 5000 sources. I googled "Balamani 1937". --Action Hero 16:50, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Intiguttu (1958 film). Action Hero 06:28, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Please if you could take a look at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Anurag Kashyap filmography/archive1 as well. Yashthepunisher (talk) 2:39, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
- For the third and last time I'm nominating this list for FL, and I can't afford another failure. So, please leave your comments. Yashthepunisher (talk) 16:49, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Congratulations
![]() | Featured article
| ![]() |
- Congrats :) —Vensatry (ping) 04:09, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Writer's Barnstar |
For bringing Kalidas (film), the article related to the first south Indian sound film, to FA status. ![]() |
So what's next? Mullum Malarum FAC / Thuppakki accolades' FLC / something else? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 04:12, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- Both are possible. But I plan to expand MM once I get this book Cinemavum Naanum by its director. Parasakthi looks like an excellent candidate though. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:55, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- Then go ahead with Parasakthi. Is Anushka Shetty's GA plan shelved BTW? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 07:24, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- Probably. The user who wanted it to be GA with my help (Soham) has seemingly retired, and I did what he told me to do: clean it up. But I never had any serious intention to make it GA. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:56, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- BLPs are truly a painful set of things to work on, especially related to South India. Wonder how Bollywood-related BLPs are turning GAs/FAs. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:59, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- They are indeed a painful experience. Priyanka Chopra turning FA on its third attempt only, Shah Rukh Khan on second attempt... with frequent edit wars that make such articles unstable, I guess making a Bollywood BLP FA should be an achievement equal to reaching the moon. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:18, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- Bollywood related BLPs like Padukone and Balan get promoted on their first attempt but even that is quite a tedious process too. Frankly, it's much easier working on films and getting them to GA, although it's a tough process for FA. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 09:22, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- We can't even bring the BLP of an actor working in a single language to GA status. Such a scarcity of RS we have. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:35, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- Pavanjandhyala, I feel Prince's article has a good chance of becoming a GA with a good copyedit and reworking the lead and charity sections. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 09:39, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- Which Prince are you referring to Ssven2? If it is Mahesh Babu, then i took a small break from it recently to avoid a feel of monotony. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:41, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Pavanjandhyala: I was referring to Mahesh Babu. Yep, in the words of the good doctor, "I sniff GA potential".
— Ssven2 Speak 2 me 09:43, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- I only use "sniff" for FA potential articles :-)♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:26, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Dr. Blofeld: Ah yes. Well it's become quite a catchphrase I must say, Doc. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 11:42, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- I only use "sniff" for FA potential articles :-)♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:26, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Pavanjandhyala: I was referring to Mahesh Babu. Yep, in the words of the good doctor, "I sniff GA potential".
- Which Prince are you referring to Ssven2? If it is Mahesh Babu, then i took a small break from it recently to avoid a feel of monotony. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:41, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- Pavanjandhyala, I feel Prince's article has a good chance of becoming a GA with a good copyedit and reworking the lead and charity sections. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 09:39, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- We can't even bring the BLP of an actor working in a single language to GA status. Such a scarcity of RS we have. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:35, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- Bollywood related BLPs like Padukone and Balan get promoted on their first attempt but even that is quite a tedious process too. Frankly, it's much easier working on films and getting them to GA, although it's a tough process for FA. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 09:22, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- They are indeed a painful experience. Priyanka Chopra turning FA on its third attempt only, Shah Rukh Khan on second attempt... with frequent edit wars that make such articles unstable, I guess making a Bollywood BLP FA should be an achievement equal to reaching the moon. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:18, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- BLPs are truly a painful set of things to work on, especially related to South India. Wonder how Bollywood-related BLPs are turning GAs/FAs. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:59, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- Probably. The user who wanted it to be GA with my help (Soham) has seemingly retired, and I did what he told me to do: clean it up. But I never had any serious intention to make it GA. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:56, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- Then go ahead with Parasakthi. Is Anushka Shetty's GA plan shelved BTW? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 07:24, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Sniffing FA for Rod Steiger, we'll nom this coming week..♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:51, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Dr. Blofeld: [3].
— Ssven2 Speak 2 me 11:54, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- Has Kailash or Pavanjandhyala seen any Steiger? ♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:57, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Pavanjandhyala and Kailash29792: Do see his films like Across the Bridge, In the Heat of the Night and No Way To Treat a Lady. They're all great ones. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 12:01, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- Will surely watch them. Have heard always good things about Kubrick, Steiger and Hitchcock (his Vertigo is my favourite). Let's see what Steiger has in store for me :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:38, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Pavanjandhyala and Kailash29792: Do see his films like Across the Bridge, In the Heat of the Night and No Way To Treat a Lady. They're all great ones. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 12:01, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- Has Kailash or Pavanjandhyala seen any Steiger? ♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:57, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Jacqueline Fernandez
Today, with some strong help from Dr. Blofeld, i have completed my first (and probably the last) GA review of Jacqueline Fernandez. I promoted it and suggested its nominator FrB.TG to get it c/ed by a member of GOCE for further tightening of the prose which i find okay enough for a good article standard. Thought i should share this with you. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:50, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Writer's Barnstar |
For your amazing work on Kalidas and taking it to FA status. ![]() |
- By the way, i asked you plenty of times to look at my flcs, you promised but never showed up. Are there any reasons? Just asking.Krish | Talk 17:47, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- I already said before, I have exams (which end tomorrow, the 15th) and then I'll look into your FLCs. Kailash29792 (talk)
Orphaned non-free image File:Raja rani tamil.jpg
![⚠](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/34/Ambox_warning_blue.svg/35px-Ambox_warning_blue.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Raja rani tamil.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:44, 17 September 2015 (UTC)