User talk:KTucker

Welcome!

Hello, KTucker, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- JLaTondre 02:20, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well now your caught😂😂😂😂😂 Mandamae60 (talk) 11:42, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

On 16-May, you created a "soft" redirect from Free knowledge to Libre knowledge. You should do a real redirect in cases like this. The instructions for how are at Wikipedia:Redirect. I've fixed this one, but if you need help in the future, let me know. Thanks! -- JLaTondre 02:20, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Libre Page

Hi Kim, I've (finally!) gotten around to incorporating your suggested changes back into the draft Libre article. Thanks! --Sanglorian (talk) 21:08, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, you have done a great job. I will try to make time to look at the rest. - Kim Tucker (talk) 21:55, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Libre culture - article on enwp

Hello! I'm not native english. Could You create, please the Libre culture article?

Based on our Category:Libre culture and the commonscat Libre culture? --->

I wrote this: The Libre culture is the set the Copyleft activities in Spain especilally since 2005, the Libre Culture Manifesto.[1]

SZERVÁC Attila (talk) 10:02, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you for asking :-). I'll make it simple: Libre culture - K (talk) 18:45, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

THX :) I just linked it with improved Hungarian, Spanish, French, Italian, Catalan, Occitan and Polish versions + w/ the CommonsCat :-) Yes, as RMS said on TEDx14: "Say Libre!" Fingers crossed :-)

Well done :-) --K (talk) 02:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Category talk:Libre software

Category:Category talk:Libre software, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. PaleAqua (talk) 03:51, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I did not create that category (and presume you mean Category:Libre software) but will comment anyway. Thanks for letting me know. --K (talk) 00:19, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry guess Twinkle bugged out on me, just noticed. Don't know why it went to you instead of the right editor. PaleAqua (talk) 03:35, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No worries :-) - K (talk) 03:55, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Libre (word) has been accepted

Libre (word), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- Orduin ^Discuss 01:14, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For saving Libre in Draft:Libre, and working on it until it became acceptable to become Libre (word). Thank you! -- Orduin ^Discuss 01:18, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! Thank you :-) - K (talk) 14:58, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Libre knowledge for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Libre knowledge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libre knowledge until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Keφr 20:31, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. Busy trying to understand that conflict of interest thing ... will respond soon. - K (talk) 01:08, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Libre art for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Libre art is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libre art until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Keφr 13:38, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

After the deletion I'll rewrite the Libre art properly :)

Hi, Kim!

"Notorious deletionists!" :) Despite the references of the LAL, LILA, Blender etc. Libre art will be deleted. However Libre culture are living :) Don't worry after the Easter I'll ressurect Libre art. I sent You (kctucker account on gml IMHO :-)) a Manager invite here the G+ Community of The International Libre Art Community with LILA people, Blender Team and so on! :) please, follow! :) SZERVÁC Attila (talk) 12:57, notanaprilfool (1), 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, KTucker. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Libre culture for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Libre culture is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libre culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Keφr 19:04, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kim

Saw a notification about an email from "User:KTucker" but never saw the email - don't know where it ended up unless at a long since discarded email.

Anyway all well here - am running Master Maths Florida which you can google if you like. As far as Wikipedia is concerned, have contributed on pages relating to Ptolemy's Theorem, Plimpton 322 and Diophantus. All relating to Maths history. Also wrote most of the article on "Continuous Repayment Mortgage" which relates to financial Maths.

Have also posed the question "Does proton radius actually exist ?". See Wikipedia's talk page on the currently topical Proton radius puzzle.

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Proton_radius_puzzle

However I am sure most serious scientists would see me as just another Wiki crackpot!

Keep well!

--Neil Parker (talk) 10:37, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]