User talk:KMOX4

December 2017

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to 2017 Chicago Bears season. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 02:25, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Template:2017 AFC standings, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember that Wikipedia is a widely used reference tool, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the sandbox instead. Thank you. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 02:53, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Template:2017 AFC standings.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 02:56, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Template:2017 AFC standings. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 02:58, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Template:2017 AFC standings, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The "show preview" button is right next to the "save page" button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. You seemed to be having issues with handling the table here. The page preview allows you to spot any mistakes you may have made before you publish your changes. Hope this helps. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 16:03, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to 2017 Seattle Seahawks season has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: 2017 Seattle Seahawks season was changed by KMOX4 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.891239 on 2018-01-01T00:26:05+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:26, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Super Bowl XLI instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:KMOX4/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:KMOX4/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 02:41, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KMOX4! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 02:41, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Sports Authority Field at Mile High, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Also, you need to present reliable sources. BilCat (talk) 04:15, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:KMOX4/sandbox

Hello, KMOX4. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:24, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Hello, I'm Aspening. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Barack Obama— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk or my talk page. Thank you. Aspening (talk) 02:44, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You had already experimented amply. So what was your reason or purpose for this edit? -- Hoary (talk) 05:24, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince was changed by KMOX4 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.97591 on 2018-10-21T05:40:04+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:40, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at United States presidential election in Illinois, 2004. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Iseult^Δxparlez moi 04:56, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Illinois gubernatorial election, 2018. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mélencron (talk) 02:15, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 03:37, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KMOX4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Learned my lessson i just piss off over my canidates Losing im just saying il is gonna be screw i do aplogize. KMOX4 (talk) 03:58, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:15, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

State your reason for believing your block was incorrect or for requesting reconsideration. It is not enough if you just say that the block was "wrong" or "unfair", or another user violated a policy first. You must explain why it was wrong to block you, or why it should be reversed. Address the blocking administrator's concerns about your conduct (the reason given for your block). As explained above, you have been informed about the reason for your block. You must address this reason in your request. This means that you must either explain why the block reason is incorrect or not applicable to your conduct, or you must convince the reviewing administrator that you won't do it again. Give evidence.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KMOX4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I belive the block is no longer nesscary as i belive i have learned my lesson and i was block for vandizim and uncessery edits, I promise not to do it any more and make tru edits to your wiki KMOX4 (talk) 21:58, 7 November 2018 (UTC) KMOX4[reply]

Decline reason:

You will need to state what the lesson is that you have learned, and tell specifically what Give the poor spelling of your requests, I also have some concerns that you don't yet possess the maturity needed to participate in this project. I am declining this request. 331dot (talk) 23:23, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KMOX4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I belive i have learn my lesson,The lesson is not to make bias infomation or vandalizes pages because you canidate didnt win or you dont like him. Also for Legit edits i do want to make I Will add Like Recent Updates to games or any new Issue that happens.KMOX4 (talk) 03:29, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This unblock request, too, is basically incoherent. Yamla (talk) 13:43, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KMOX4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It has been a while since my block, and I feel like I should be able to retry. I was a person that wasn't thinking at the time when I did it, Now since I am 18 and have been matureing at a fast rate. I feel like I should be given a second chance. KMOX4 (talk) 02:06, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

When an editor who has been blocked for vandalism requests an unblock and shows that he or she accepts that their past editing was unacceptable, and undertakes not to do the same again, I am a great believer in unblocking them to give another chance. I am especially willing to do that after a fairly long time has passed, as people, especially young people, can change over the course of a year or so. However, in your case I'm afraid I have to share the concerns expressed by Yamla and Deepfriedokra. Unfortunately your English varies from totally incoherent at its worst to comprehensible but full of errors at its best. Much as I would like to give you another chance, I really have to conclude that your ability to write English is not at the level needed to contribute to an English language encyclopaedia. JBW (talk) Formerly JamesBWatson 13:46, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As I've reviewed a prior request, I will not review another out of fairness to you; however, it will help the reviewer if you could describe what contributions you want to make. 331dot (talk) 02:11, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What I plan to do for my edits, Is to add detail that maybe lacking in some pages, but also undo pages if they contain any fake infomations, such as wrong teams, vindazing pages to make other teams happier, I.E Changing someones score form like 2-14 to 10-6 even though that wasn't there record, If I am unblock, I will not aubse this privage I Have been regiven. and I feel like its about time. KMOX4 (talk) 02:31, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This, too, is nearly incoherent. I'm afraid everything I see shows you don't currently have the capability of editing the English version of Wikipedia. --Yamla (talk) 11:01, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying my best to get my grammar better. But I feel like the blocked should be lifted.

Dear Lord. I'm afraid that I share Yamla's concerns. You'll need to write more understandably for our readers to be able to make sense of what you have written. How would you recognize and correct inaccurate information? Also, please reflect and comment on the statement, "all content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking." -- Deep fried okra 17:37, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would reserach the topic first, make sure if the scores where correct for the game, if not, I would check a sports website that I can trust like ESPN Or undo if it was a big fake, i.e massive vandl KMOX4 (talk) 04:03, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KMOX4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The Reason I wished to be unblocked as I have been getting better with my grammar skills and been using stuff to correct spelling mistakes, also I have notice on one of the pages, it hads false infomation On the Storks Page,this song doesn't appear in the film, It might of appear in interional prints, but this not surfuce on any releases, To make a long story short, This is fake. But If you want anything else, let me know. KMOX4 (talk) 21:35, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is hardly a coherent request, and seeing as TPA has been revoked (rightly) there is little chance for clarification. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 00:07, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is clearly a lost cause. I'm sorry, your ability to write coherent sentences is so far below what is required to edit here. I'm afraid you will have to stick to your own language version of Wikipedia. I have revoked talk page access, another admin will be along shortly to review your request. --Yamla (talk) 21:51, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.