User talk:KMMelvin
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
{{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Quintiq.
- To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Pol430 talk to me 18:25, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
- The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
- You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the Help desk or on the reviewer's talk page
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Ceradon talkcontribs 00:01, 1 February 2012 (UTC)WP:COI - QuintiQ
[edit]Hi! I have applied a WP:COI tag today to the article on Quintiq, as you appear to have broken out rules on COI. I note that (redacted) contains an entry for (redacted). Please read our rules on COI, and abide them in future. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 20:29, 13 June 2012 (UTC) Modified: -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 05:20, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Trident13! You should also read the rules on COI... I refer you to this section:
"Dealing with suspected conflicted editors The first approach should be direct discussion of the issue with the editor, referring to this guideline. If persuasion fails, consider whether you are involved in a content dispute. If so, an early recourse to dispute resolution may help. Another option is to initiate discussion at WP:COIN, where experienced editors may be able to help you resolve the matter without recourse to publishing assertions and accusations on Wikipedia. Using COI allegations to harass an editor or to gain the upper hand in a content dispute is prohibited, and can result in a block or ban. Wikipedia places importance on both the neutrality of articles and the ability of editors to edit pseudonymously. Do not out an editor's real life identity in order to prove a conflict of interest. Wikipedia's policy against harassment prohibits this. COI situations are usually revealed when the editor themself discloses a relationship to the subject that they are editing. In case the editor does not identify themself or their affiliation, reference to the neutral point of view policy may help counteract biased editing."
I'd appreciate it if you'd remove the link to Linked In. Thanks. KMMelvin (talk) 04:26, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Conflict of Interest : SolveIt
[edit]Hi Trident13, could you please clarify whether you have a conflict of interest re. SolveIT_Software and its competitors. It seems that you edited and flagged for COI a SolveIt comepetitor's page (Quintiq) around the same day that you added to the SolveIT_Software page, which you also created. There's another contributor, Michael.davies1, who may be in a similar situation. Thanks. --KMMelvin (talk) 10:17, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
- I have no COI re SolveIT. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 22:18, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
- May I ask what motivated you to create the SolveIT page? KMMelvin (talk) 07:48, 1 August 2012 (UTC)