User talk:K8mcg22

Block evasion

Merck's PR team has been indefinitely blocked. See User_talk:Florian_Schaub_at_Merck_KGaA. Please stop editing immediately. Jytdog (talk) 19:43, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

K8mcg22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

k8mcg22 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I am not affiliated with the company Merck's PR team nor am I an employee there. I would like to change my username to one that complies with the policy such as, k8mcg22. Please let me know, thank you in advance!

Accept reason:

Allowing username change to requested username. Username has been changed to K8mcg22. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 20:43, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your username reflected Merck's and your edits were related to Merck. Please explain your relationship with the company. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 20:50, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to have started editing another account? K8mcg... you need to use just one. I've asked for a reply at the other account. You can reply here instead if you like. Jytdog (talk) 13:47, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emanuel Merck Lectureship has been accepted

Emanuel Merck Lectureship, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 02:38, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Future Insight Prize (April 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please do not cite press releases. What we need are sources that are independent, reliable, and WP:SECONDARY.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Future Insight Prize and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Future Insight Prize, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- RoySmith (talk) 18:50, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, K8mcg22! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- RoySmith (talk) 18:50, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Future Insight Prize has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Future Insight Prize. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 18:51, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Future Insight Prize and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Future Insight Prize, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

1292simon (talk) 08:09, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Emanuel Merck Lectureship.pdf

The file File:Emanuel Merck Lectureship.pdf has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused plaintext PDF, encyclopedic information should be in an article and not a PDF, we are not a WP:WEBHOST.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 03:05, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]