User talk:K00la1dx

Welcome!

Hi K00la1dx! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Vanjagenije (talk) 22:45, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

K00la1dx, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi K00la1dx! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

October 2021

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Michael Faraday, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 12:32, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi K00la1dx! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Can I talk to someone who has read Oliver Heaviside's electromagnetic theory??, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Incivility to other users

I've now had enough of your repeated incivility to other editors. Any more comments like this one attacking me for not being English (or any other personal attacks on the motivations of other editors) is going to result in an immediate block of your account. SpinningSpark 18:06, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Hello, I'm Constant314. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Oliver Heaviside, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You need a reliable source if you are going to attribute something to a person. Constant314 (talk) 15:41, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I need a reliable source? Even if the person is DEAD? I would like you to know that the source "The Forgotton Genius of Oliver Heaviside" is not a reliable source. Reliable sources do not want to touch Oliver Heaviside. It is just too easy to say "why don't we just tap the ionosphere for our 'green' energy needs. Then we won't have to pay a carbon tax. These people on Wikipedia trying to block discussion on Heaviside are either very stupid or very evil. K00la1dx (talk) 09:37, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have a reliable source (The Forgotten Genius of Oliver Heaviside) Apparently some characters on Wikipedia block legitimate sources based on their own original research. K00la1dx (talk) 16:36, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. SpinningSpark 10:08, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

K00la1dx (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Unless Spinningspark admits to be either stupid or evil there is no insult K00la1dx (talk) 08:05, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Since you are doubling down on the attacks in this very request, I am declining it and extending the block. 331dot (talk) 10:19, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

etiquette and manors

Wikipedia claims to be unbiased and neutral. What religion or beliefs are the basis for these rules on manors? There really is a conspiracy that discussion surrounding Oliver Heaviside is suppressed on Wikipedia. What is the natural course of action but to insult the people doing it? Then you bring up, manors? Is Christianity the basis for these manors? Just like displacement current no longer is displacing an ether, the shell behind the belief is still there. I do not even know what this is "free and open source encyclopedia." K00la1dx (talk) 10:57, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To answer your question, your alternative to insulting people is to abide by the guidelines at WP:TPNO. Discuss the issues, not the editors (and that includes supposed conspiracies of editors). If you continue to make insults or post rants while you are blocked, I will take away your ability to edit your own talk page. The only thing you should be discussing while you are blocked is the block itself. SpinningSpark 16:49, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aye or Nay? It seems in the beginning of the Oliver Heaviside article you give your 'aye'

Then you do a 180 U turn and say he had nothing to do with the development of reactance. '

Well, which one is it?

Is Oliver Heaviside an uneducated hack? Or did he come to great things?

Forcing people out of their AYE and forcing into NAY. This Wikipedia kind of force is really misrepresenting the Anglo Saxon.

And BTW the Oliver Heaviside article is terrible. Is this how the English honor their heroes? K00la1dx (talk) 01:46, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced additions

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Electrical reactance. SpinningSpark 11:04, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I want to talk to another moderator. One who is familiar with Oliver Heaviside and his work dealing with reactance.K00la1dx (talk) 20:36, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Samuel Tolver Preston. VQuakr (talk) 17:07, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions, as you did at Talk:Aether theories. - DVdm (talk) 15:07, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You seem like an educated lad. please consider me:

I only wanted to edit the wiki on Samuel Tolver Preston.

Some uneducated person in regards to science decided (unfamiliar with science) to delete my post. I tried using a credible source to back up what I was trying to say but he insisted that it was no good. Anyways, the entire article on Dr. Preston is unsourced. So I do not know why he decided to pick on me. Lots of stuff gets posted on Wikipedia without a source.

Why don't you head over to the Dr. Preston article, and tell me how it already doesn't completely already say that Dr. Preston discovered E=mc^2 using his own interpretation of relativity and special relativity 5 years before Einstein was even born.

K00la1dx (talk) 16:40, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Some uneducated hack" is a wp:personal attack. I stopped reading your response at that point. Don't do that, unless you want to get blocked. Next time the block will probably be indefinite. - DVdm (talk) 16:48, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There I fixed it, read on... K00la1dx (talk) 16:57, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Daniel Case (talk) 06:14, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

K00la1dx (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I only want to edit the Samuel Tolver Preston article. I have no intention of any misconduct. K00la1dx (talk) 18:53, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 20:00, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

K00la1dx (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It has been a while since I was blocked. I no longer intend to vandalize pages on wiki. I no longer intend to create inappropriate discussions on talk pages. I intend to create meaningful contributions to wiki...K00la1dx (talk) 18:40, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate and confirm that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
Reading our guide to improving articles.
Picking any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
- If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas.

Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:

Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
- do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}}),
- do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]),
- do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]),
- and do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
Click edit at your talk page and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
Place {{reflist-talk}} at the end of the prose you have copied from the article;
Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste an edit summary in the following form that specifies the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
Save the page by clicking Publish changes.
Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
When you are done with your work, save your edits, then re-request unblocking using {{unblock}}, and an administrator will review your proposed edits.

If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will hopefully improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 23:37, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Can you please allow me to edit articles on some type of trial basis? I can prove I can improve the wiki by making meaningful edits...K00la1dx (talk) 20:35, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]