User talk:K.stubbs40893/Evaluate an Article

Hi K.stubbs - I'm in your class, WDM, and am here to give feedback on your review. After reading the article, I agree with you about the need for a more elaborate Lead section, as well as expounding on the Controversy section. This would be a great article for you to work on for your project if it interests you. I do have a few grammatical errors to bring to your attention. In your Content and Overall sections: the word "articles" should be possessive (article's) as well as the word "it's" (its). In the Tone & Balance section: the contraction "there's" should be "there are" to maintain subject-verb agreement. Thank you for the evaluation, otherwise I would not have known about this program. MollyMoxenFree (talk) 01:32, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi K.stubbs - I'm also in your class, WDM, and I'm giving you feedback as well. After I read the article I agree that one picture is needed and is cut and dry like you said. I think they should put more pictures than just one but maybe that might take away from the information presented. Grammatical errors like Molly mention are there but I did not find anymore when reading the review over and over again. Overall good review and thank you for showing me this program about this. Great evaluation. --ZayMcCoy (talk) 17:41, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi K. Stubbs - I'm in your class as well and I'm giving feedback on your article. When I read your article I agree with the improtant of books toward the universites with the numerous amount of links.The Lead however lacked complete interest as you said, the only picture showed was somewhat inviting. The few grammatical erros aren't destrucitve towards the article and I thank you for this evaluation. --BrandonJohnson 02:42, 13 June 2020 (UTC)Brandonjohnson2 (talk)