User talk:K.korfitzen

Welcome!

Hello, K.korfitzen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Cabayi (talk) 21:06, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

K.korfitzen, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi K.korfitzen! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:41, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia

Please bear in mind that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and that the text you write today has to be just as relevant when it's read in ten years time. In Leone C. Bradbury you wrote that ""Flights of Fancy" is currently displayed in Centennial Hall", perhaps "was displayed in Centennial Hall from October 2014"?

We also have inclusion criteria based on notability and verifiability. In the case of Nicole Anona Banowetz, she doesn't seem to meet the specific notability criteria for artists, WP:ARTIST, and the subject's own website isn't considered a reliable or independent source. Hope that helps, Cabayi (talk) 21:23, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Linking to external websites from the text of the article isn't part of the house style. If Pirate: Contemporary Art is worth mentioning it ought to have its own article. Linking straight to their website is less encyclopedic, more advertising. Cabayi (talk) 21:28, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]