User talk:Jyomon

Welcome!

Welcome, Jyomon!

Hello, Jyomon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages that you might find helpful. If you need interactive assistance please visit The Help desk. You may want to begin by reading these pages:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions. Again, welcome! Sincerely, - SUN EYE 1 10:42, 6 April 2023 (UTC) [reply]

May 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Simran (actress), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 17:13, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I saw huge content at the intro over that page, without proper evidences or reliable references..how can some one write up without proper sources ....can you explain???? Simple and conceiving way of write up is beauty.do you agree?? Jyomon (talk) 04:17, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:CITELEAD. Ravensfire (talk) 14:19, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mirnaa Menon, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:37, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rajmohol - you removed my citations and background of the script.

Please look at the citations from Filmfare and Times of India before removing them. Rajmohol is mentioned in both articles, and what the background of the screenplay. It is not just a citation for original, it is a citation for Rajmohol as well. Anooprm (talk) 22:29, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting

My all actions are provably impartial. pl. delete unhelpful accusations against me from my talk page and wp:ANI with your due apology on top priority. -- Bookku (talk) 06:31, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

pl. be aware as per wp:CTOP Wikipedia:Contentious topics/Biographies of Living Persons too is applicable to wp:BLP.

Bookku (talk) 07:22, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paris Laxmi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asianet. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Hello, I'm DaxServer. I noticed that you recently removed content from NTR: Kathanayakudu without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 12:04, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm SP013. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Game Changer have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. SP013 (talk) 17:53, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Anita Hassanandani. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Do not remove longstanding sourced names and images with proper copyright. Discuss first in the talk page to gain consensus per WP:BRD instead of edit warring. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:49, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Naaga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Director.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 11:44, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RoySmith

@RoySmith, Uncle you are mistaken me ...Recheck and reconfirm please Jyomon (talk) 14:22, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Currently am using mobile with wifi connected ... Uncle you are mistaken me for someone else...not fair uncle

Filmfare South - Best Actress Critics

Hello, I've noticed that you have added winner for 2016 in Malayalam category for Filmfare Critics Award for Best Actress – South.No award for Malayalam in this category in the year 2016. If your edit is true, please support this with a reliable source User1257 (talk) 15:51, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]