User talk:Jvfmgnlllj

Jvfmgnlllj, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Jvfmgnlllj! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I noticed that in this edit to President of the United Nations General Assembly, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 07:52, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Phil Goff Mayor Auckland.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Phil Goff Mayor Auckland.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Schwede 66 19:06, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wait until inauguration

Please don't add Donald Trump to any presidential lists, until he becomes US President. This won't occur until January 20, 2017. GoodDay (talk) 23:53, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Will you STOP adding Trump? He doesn't become US President until January 20, 2017. GoodDay (talk) 02:52, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Greetings; Barack Obama remains President until January 20, 2017, when his term ends. Donald Trump, being President-Elect until then, is not yet one of the US Presidents. Please stop adding Donald Trump to US presidential lists and please also stop reverting the edits of others, myself included, when they remove his name. Donald Trump does not belong on any US presidential list January 20, 2017. Drdpw (talk) 03:04, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're only gonna end up getting blocked. GoodDay (talk) 03:05, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AN

You've been reported here. -- GoodDay (talk) 04:15, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring on multiple articles. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Someguy1221 (talk) 04:20, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, regarding the images you have uploaded which are now tagged for deletion, works of the Fiji government are not automatically entered into the public domain [1], and should not be claimed as such. Someguy1221 (talk) 04:46, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Fiji Diwali 2014.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Fiji Diwali 2014.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Majora (talk) 04:24, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Frank Bainimamarma.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Frank Bainimamarma.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Majora (talk) 04:24, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Continued edit warring

I'm sorry, but I had to block you again, this time for 72 hours. Your 24 hour block was not permission to go right back to the same edit war once your 24 hours was up. Please see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution to read about how you are supposed to handle content disputes. Please remember that Wikipedia is a collaborative project - you don't get to just force your edits into an article because you're convinced everyone else is wrong. Someguy1221 (talk) 05:47, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

Jvfmgnlllj (talk · contribs) is currently engaged in various edit wars and needs another block. Schwede 66 08:08, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

Jvfmgnlllj - You have been blocked twice for edit warring, and have since engaged in the exact same behavior immediately after being unblocked. You do not have to violate 3RR in order to be engaging in edit warring and violating policy (I see that you've reverted twice on List of Prime Ministers of New Zealand by date of birth, Bill English, and three times on New Zealand general election, 2017) - you need to understand that you're still violating policy because your reversions are occurring in place of proper dispute resolution practices, such as discussing your issue on the article's talk page and coming to a consensus with other editors before making the changes specified.

This is your final warning. You need to read and understand Wikipedia's policies and guidelines on dispute resolution and edit warring and discuss your issue and make edits to the article that reflect consensus from those discussions. Continuing to make reverts on articles without a discussion, or any further engagement in edit warring will lead to a significantly longer block being placed on your account. You've been warned and blocked twice - you should be well aware of how to correctly resolve issues and disputes and engage in constructive editing. Please let me know if you have any questions. I'll be happy to answer them and assist you. Thank you for understanding. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:31, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oshwah might want to weigh in on your current dispute at List of United States political catchphrases. - SummerPhD^v2.0 04:10, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Hello, I'm Schwede66. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction, such as your addition to User_talk:J947#editing_error. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. Thank you. Schwede 66 08:34, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shalen Lal

The article Shalen Lal has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cahk (talk) 10:24, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Stuff.co.nz, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.-gadfium 19:02, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Nadi Council

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Nadi Council. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – [[:Nadi]]. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at [[:Nadi]] – you might like to discuss new information at [[Talk:Nadi|the article's talk page]].

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Ste moc 10:23, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jvfmgnlllj

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Jvfmgnlllj requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. JamesG5 (talk) 05:02, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Mount Albert (New Zealand electorate), as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Adding content is never a minor edit. Schwede 66 06:13, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this edit, what part of not marking your edits as minor when you add content do you not get? You will get yourself blocked again if you disregard the rules that you've been told about before. Schwede 66 07:26, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mohammed Saneem

The article Mohammed Saneem has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability concerns. Being "Supervisor of Elections" in Fiji doesn't meet WP:NPOL, and no other claim of notability appears to exist.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:42, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Ollie035 may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you.-gadfium 07:29, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jvfmgnlllj. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Can you please add your sources to List of statutes of New Zealand (2017–present)? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 20:44, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please respond to my messages? Boleyn (talk) 08:21, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please respond? Your other articles are referenced properly and you have shown you do know how to respond to talk page messages, so I'm not sure why you are ignoring this. Boleyn (talk) 09:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond - WP:Communication is required on Wikipedia (and it's polite). Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 17:37, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

By refusing to communicate, and refusing to address another editor's concern, you are risking a block. Please respond - I am trying to help. What was your source for this article? Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 19:59, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message on my talk page. You just go to User talk:Jvfmgnlllj and click on edit, then write under my messages. You wrote that you don't have any sources, but you got your information from somewhere - where was it? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 12:33, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please respond? Boleyn (talk) 15:00, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond - I again point out that WP:Communication is required, not optional. Boleyn (talk) 08:50, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (List of statutes of New Zealand (2017–present)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating List of statutes of New Zealand (2017–present), Jvfmgnlllj!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please add your sources.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 12:28, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Commission of Inquiry into Historical Abuse in State Care

I'm going to put a few sources around the article. There's a WP:NPOV issue that I've fixed. For now, as a stub it seems fine. Once more information comes out about it, it might be able to be expanded. _{Vermont | reply here} 01:47, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki page Plain tobacco packaging, can you change the image of the world map of New Zealand to red, as it has been enforced today. Thanks

The practice so far has been to have in red countries where only plain packs can be sold. At the moment we are still in a transition period where sellers are allowed to sell their old packs, like in Norway. I have the dates in my calendar; New Zealand will be in red on June 6, and Norway on July 1st. I have updated the French version of the plain packaging article a few hours ago to inform readers that New Zealand has now entered the transition period. Ydecreux (talk) 07:55, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Boleyn (talk) 20:47, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've blocked your account for refusing to communicate. Swarm ♠ 01:44, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Graeme Bartlett:Hi, I have been blocked just recently for not communicating to a wiki user. I was not aware that not communicating with users is a serious offence. I was confused on what to do with the source the user was telling me, which made really worried that I did not know what to reply. But now I know that communicating is effective in the Wikipedia forum. I have learnt my lesson and will ensure that I will communicate with users as I know that it is a serious offence. Can you please unblock me, as I love editing and it is really making me regret my decision I have made. Cheers. Jvfmgnlllj (talk) 02:01, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Since User:Swarm blocked you, they should be the one to consider unblocking. Blocking can be a way to draw your attention to something that you are unresponsive to. I think that what is expected is that you give some sort of response to the ANI discussion (which will now be archived). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:11, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion was here: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive980#User:Jvfmgnlllj. What do you want to respond to Boleyn on this issue? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:18, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Graeme Bartlett: Thanks mate for your clarification, I hope User:Swarm unblocks me.

@Swarm: Hi, can you please unblock me, I feel so depressed right now without contributing on the wiki forum. Jvfmgnlllj (talk) 03:44, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You can also formally request an unblock with this : {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

However I suggest first that you try to get a good answer to Boleyn, who has asked a question a few sections back about sourcing in List of statutes of New Zealand (2017–present). Take a read of WP:Referencing for beginners. And say where you got the information from. Hopefully it is from a reliable source that can be confirmed by somebody else. There are some kinds of information we cannot use though, like if you worked it out all by your self, you made it all up, or a friend told you. If something is like that you can have the bits removed. Anyway since you are still blocked, you can respond with your answer (and sources?) here on the talk page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:04, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Boleyn: Hi, I do not know anything about the source, I might have lost it, I am so sorry I did not reply to you as I did not have the source and I was finding it really confusing. I have learnt my lesson and will reply, please forgive me. Jvfmgnlllj (talk) 04:13, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for replying. Boleyn (talk) 06:14, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Graeme Bartlett:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jvfmgnlllj (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hey, mate I have replied to Boleyn and everything has been sorted, can you please consider unblocking me as Swarm is not responding to my request. Cheers Jvfmgnlllj (talk) 06:28, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No longer blocked. SQL ^{Query me!} 02:37, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

</nowiki>

@Graeme Bartlett: Hey, can you please unblock my account, Swarm is still not responding, it would be much appreciated, thanks.Jvfmgnlllj (talk) 09:02, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK I have unbocked you. To have the bet outcome, please talk to people here, especially when they talk to you or disagree with you. And please base your writingson what others hwave written, so you can prove it is true. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:16, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Need help on Template:Jacinda Ardern sidebar

@Hazhk: Hi can you please help me out on making the portrait of Jacinda Ardern fit the template. I find it really confusing to edit. Template:Jacinda Ardern sidebar ThanksJvfmgnlllj (talk) 09:10, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Need help on 2018 New Zealand Budget

@Hazhk: Hi can you please help me out on making the 2018 New Zealand budget. Cheers.

Dan Bidois

At 8:30 pm, Stuff was claiming that the votes wouldn't be counted till 10:00 pm. Meanwhile, the Herald said that with 75 percent of the votes counted, the other candidate had conceded. That's not an official result, but to you and some others a newspaper claim is sufficient these days and you changed articles on that basis. I'm reminded of the US election of 1948, when one newspaper declared a candidate the winner and had to publish a correction the next day. Akld guy (talk) 09:05, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Domestic Violence—Victims' Protection Act 2018

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Domestic Violence—Victims' Protection Act 2018 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jul/26/new-zealand-paid-domestic-violence-leave-jan-logie. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. gadfium 06:14, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Simon Bridges

Your recent editing history at Simon Bridges shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.-gadfium 04:21, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Cullen (politician)

Hi, can you help me edit this wiki article Thanks. I think I made a mistake. Paora

Jami-Lee Ross

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Jami-Lee Ross, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -gadfium 03:47, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did at Jami-Lee Ross, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sheldybett (talk) 04:00, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring, as you did at Jami-Lee Ross. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Kinu ^t/_c 07:44, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fiji Election

Hi I will soon edit the wiki page of the Fiji election I was just wondering. How do you edit live results in wiki. I went to the infobox election and the template of reporting was there but how do you put that template without doing errors. You can see my wiki contributions I did for the cook island election just to practice on what to do.

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jvfmgnlllj. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Premila Kumar) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Premila Kumar.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

Write a helpful note for Jvfmgnlllj. It will be posted on their talk page.

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:24, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Salik Ram Govind) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Salik Ram Govind.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

Please be aware that continued inclusion of WP:COPYVIO could get you banned from editing.

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:26, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Joseph Nand) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Joseph Nand.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

Write a helpful note for Jvfmgnlllj. It will be posted on their talk page.

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:30, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kader Khan

You have been reverted. he died at 6pm on 31 December 2018 in Canada, so we should state the Local time of the place he died --DBig Xrayᗙ 08:19, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fiji

Best we stick to the reliable source. Thanks. El_C 06:26, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! El_C 06:48, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Jvfmgnlllj, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to George Vegnathan have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GirthSummit _(blether) 07:57, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I just wanted to follow up with a more personal message in addition to the automated template above. I just reviewed George Vegnathan - thanks for creating it! I noticed that some of the prose seemed to have been copied directly from one of your sources, which we mustn't do - I reworded it so that it is different now, but please be careful about this sort of thing. Cheers GirthSummit _(blether) 07:59, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of most common surnames in Oceania, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nand and Deo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:11, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Coronavirus map outbreak

Can you update the map created by Hueman1. This is the map you'll find on Wikipedia commons: File:COVID-19 pandemic cases in Fiji.svg If you have any experience on updating this map, please do so. By the way, images are essential as well. Thanks Naimatau (talk) 03:35, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

I saw that you recently undid my revision on COVID-19 pandemic in Fiji. May I know why?

Also, when you undo someone's edit, please specify the reason in the edit summary per WP:FIES.

Thanks. KRtau16 ^«Talk» 05:40, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Update: The lead serves as an introduction to the article and a summary of its most important contents, therefore I've summarised the article by adding the important contents even though it's already there in the timeline.

Thanks again. KRtau16 ^«Talk» 05:58, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since you're editing a lot of Fijian politics articles...

This user invites you to join
WikiProject Fiji.

Deletion

Notifying of deletion of COVID-19 pandemic in the Kurdistan Region Thepharoah17 (talk) 21:14, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Summary of cases

Aren't you going to update the summary of cases as it is becoming outdated with the latest being on Case 32? Also, the statistics about the clusters in Fiji. Thanks. KRtau16 (talk) 05:52, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fijian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]