User talk:Justyourkamerad

Welcome, Justyourkamerad!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Justyourkamerad! I'm I dream of horses, and I've been assigned as your mentor. Around 10% of new Wikipedia accounts receive a mentor randomly taken from a list of volunteers. It just means I'm here to help with anything you need! We need to have all kinds of people working together to create an online encyclopedia, so I'm glad you're here. Over time, you will figure out what you enjoy doing the most on Wikipedia.

You might have noticed that you have access to a tutorial and suggested edits. It's recommended that you take advantage of this, as it'll make learning how to edit Wikipedia easier.

If you need assistance with anything or have any questions, click on the "Get editing help" button on the bottom right corner of your screen. This will open up a module with links to help pages and a place to ask me questions. You can also ask me questions directly on my talk page, or go here to get help from the wider community.

Again, welcome to Wikipedia! I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 13:26, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Amended from text on the Adolf Hitler talk page

Justyourkamerad, on WP we use the usual name in English for a political office, place etc. which is not necessarily the 'official name', Hence we use Taoiseach for the person running the Irish govt, but Chancellor for the similar political office in Germany, since the former is common in English, but 'Reichskanzler' isn't, especially married to the English word 'Germany'. If no 'usual name' exists, we'll often use the 'native' language name. The other edits you did I've undone since it's especially unhelpful to have one name in the infobox, but a different name in the text. The article about the political office, such as President of Germany, is where the 'native' title should always be found.

I hope having your first 9 edits reverted isn't disheartening, but it might be a good idea in future to check whether there is some policy or norm before engaging on a broad number of changes as you did. Pincrete (talk) 15:47, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pincrete, thanks for replying. I apologize for breaking any rules during modifying the other pages. I assumed due to most other German politicians had their office title in German. Such as Schleicher being named "Reichskommissar of Prussia" in his page. So since that role is a specifically German adopted title it would keep its German name right? Justyourkamerad (talk) 23:46, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No apologies needed. Although I don't know those other German politicians, their offices or articles, I'd also assume that no generally used/accepted title exists for "Reichskommissar of Prussia", although the article about the office doesn't use that name - so I'm not sure really, nor whether that title should be altered to its English form. Pincrete (talk) 06:14, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pellumb Qazimi (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pellumb Qazimi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 01:31, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Justyourkamerad! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 01:31, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Pellumb Qazimi has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pellumb Qazimi. Thanks! —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 01:34, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pellumb Qazimi (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Kline were:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pellumb Qazimi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kline • talk to me! • contribs 02:13, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pellumb Qazimi (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Pbritti were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The CV provided does not enable this subject to pass WP:GNG. The CV alone is only appropriate for verifying certain limited details and is not independent. Additionally, the citation formatting is broken. Please look at other articles for examples of acceptable formatting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pellumb Qazimi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pbritti (talk) 19:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pellumb Qazimi

Hello, Justyourkamerad. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pellumb Qazimi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:06, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pellumb Qazimi

Hello, Justyourkamerad. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Pellumb Qazimi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:53, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]