User talk:Justiyaya/Archive 2

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Justiyaya. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Justiyaya! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 16:05, Friday, May 21, 2021 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
292	Results of the 2021 Scottish Parliament election (talk)	Add sources
58	Medinipur division (talk)	Add sources
18	West Bengal Human Rights Commission (talk)	Add sources
14	Jhargram Raj (talk)	Add sources
291	Nyctanthes arbor-tristis (talk)	Add sources
65	Mayanism (talk)	Add sources
9	Sovabazar Raj (talk)	Cleanup
60	Bogra District (talk)	Cleanup
746	Drugs Controller General of India (talk)	Cleanup
500	Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty (talk)	Expand
1,444	Bengalis (talk)	Expand
28	Domine salvum fac regem (talk)	Expand
23	Order of War (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
61	Windows NT startup process (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
194	Housing estate (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
618	Vietnamese cuisine (talk)	Merge
212	Group marriage (talk)	Merge
244	Single room occupancy (talk)	Merge
476	World of Tanks (talk)	Wikify
55	Aquinas College (Michigan) (talk)	Wikify
131	Climate of West Bengal (talk)	Wikify
2	DYYQ-TV (talk)	Orphan
2	Ukrecoresursy (talk)	Orphan
3	Congress of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Nurses and Midwives (talk)	Orphan
17	Loris Ceroni (talk)	Stub
54	Lakshmana Sena (talk)	Stub
8	Gopala II (talk)	Stub
10	Movement Report System (talk)	Stub
4	Doutai language (talk)	Stub
8	Vigrahapala II (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:25, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Trouted

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE 2601:5CA:C302:43D0:7031:CDC9:2028:2669 (talk) 15:39, 26 May 2021 (UTC)'

Please refrain from historical inaccurate alterations to the Reconstruction Era wiki page.

Were women given Suffrage? How does that constitute FULL FREEDOM?

How about Native American voting Rights? Where these not also racially repressed? Why is it, in your view, only the Africans in America viewpoint matters? Please cease and desist your bigoted anti-Woman and anti-Native American propaganda.

@2601:5CA:C302:43D0:7031:CDC9:2028:2669: Hi, if you are referring to my revert here? I would argue that your edit, "reservationsor Native Americans anywhere upon the Americas, a great injustice" contains spelling mistakes, and potential bias. Although in my edit summary in that revert describes it as vandalism, it was more of a Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view#Impartial_tone violation, sorry about that. I don't really see a problem with that revert, please correct me if I'm wrong. -- Justiyaya (talk) 16:05, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

I appreciate your demeanor in this response.

I hold ignoring the SEVERE Constitutional and Liberty violations of ALL RACIAL GROUPS of Women in America and ESPECIALLY against Male Native Americans (under the current regime Female Native Americans would be equal, though presently (1872) inferior, slaves of this system.)

How does the constitute FULL FREEDOM?

Why does including the Re-Affirmation of Native American Disenfranchisement and the significant abuses against them in the Reconstruction era (that were frequently supported by groups associated with "Emanicpation")

I will absolutely concede I had a spelling error, I didn't want to re-edit because I thought too many edits would become problematic.

We cannot, in one hand, decry the enslavement of Africans that chose to accept the European's bondage in exchange for food, clothing and water (non such was provisioned to Native Americans), did not ever lead a *significant* revolt in history (see Haitian Slave Revolts), the same people group that were given Federal Uniforms immediately after the war and began raping and murdering Native women at a rate higher than their European counterparts and in the other hand completely ignore the Awful Plight of Women and True (Native) Americans until the 1920s, fully 60 years later.

Where was the Emancipation for Women? For Natives? Why is this not allowed to be referenced for an EMANCIPATIONIST view point?? Is the so-called Emancipationist viewpoint merely a Black Supremacist viewpoint? And us such, it must but fully removed as it violated Wikipedia's anti-racist guidelines.

Why is it wrong to bring attention to their massive failures? To bring light to the fact that people in power, regardless of color, merely saw Africans in America as warm-body voter that could be used to their advantage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:5CA:C302:43D0:7031:CDC9:2028:2669 (talk) 16:26, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia guidelines says, "Neutral articles are written with a tone that provides an unbiased, accurate, and proportionate representation of all positions included in the article. " I would argue that "a great injustice" doesn't follow this guideline, specifically, I don't think the edit is written in a unbiased tone. Justiyaya (talk) 17:13, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi Justiyaya. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when using rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! –xeno^talk 05:19, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Schools of Opportunity has been accepted

Schools of Opportunity, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

15 (talk) 11:16, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

Very nice work you are doing Vhhhhjhgy (talk) 06:07, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks :) -- Justiyaya (talk) 06:19, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Blocking an IP address from editing

Hi! Please block or stop this anonymous user with an IP address: 2409:4066:286:89C7:0:0:D70:80A4

This person is editing and adding unverified, stupid, unrelated information in the article about the renowned Indian actor "Kaiku Rajkumar" again and again since yesterday. Please look into the matter so that wrong informations doesn not filter into Wikipedia. Takhellei (talk) 08:24, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for reaching out to me, I'll look into it, please do not add any warnings on to the article page, instead, add warnings to the user page of the anon IP. I need to get home first before I can really do anything. Justiyaya (talk) 09:00, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

@Takhellei:The article seems good right now, I think to ban someone, generally they need to vandalize pass a level 4, or a level 4 im warning, in this case, I don't think the anon user did, so there isn't enough justification to ban them. The article seems normal right now, thanks for stopping vandalism. Also, I know you almost have 3,000 main space edits and are probably a lot more experienced at me at regular editing, but please read WP:WARNVAND and Wikipedia:Vandalism#How to respond to vandalism thanks! --Justiyaya (talk) 09:03, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Recent RedWarn accidental rollback

Hello, I have seen your message on my talk page. I have also make sure that my changes are reverted and I am sorry for the inconvenience. Lakwat (talk) 12:22, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

@Lakwat: We all make mistakes, It's alright. Also, can I help improve your userpage? I've been getting bored doing anti-vandal stuff. Justiyaya (talk) 12:26, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

@Justiyaya: Thanks for understanding, also it would be great if you whanted to help on my userpage as I have been trying to improve it for a good while. Lakwat (talk) 12:30, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

@Lakwat: I tried my best to improve it, tell me some things about yourself that you want to have on your user page so I can add some more userboxes for you. -Justiyaya (talk) 12:56, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

@Justiyaya: I have seen the changes, they look great and I have to thank you greatly for them. Honestly, don't worry about adding the specific stuff about me if you don't want to. Thanks again for the help.

Okay, feel free to use my user page as an example. -Justiyaya (talk) 13:12, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

@Lakwat: Also, it's really nice to take a break from anti-vandal stuff. I love working on your user page, feel free to ask for help if you need it. Justiyaya (talk) 13:15, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Justiyaya, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Vhhhhjhgy (talk) 07:25, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, I'm now a host in the Teahouse. -- Justiyaya (talk) 10:30, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Request for help with my first article

Hi, Justiyaya,

Thank you so much for your helpful comment in the Tea house. I would like to rewrite the article in English with your help. I'll appreciate you help editing the piece.

Here is the link for the draft https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:Guo_Shiyou

As for the reliable sources, The two History Research journal articles in #6 and #7 in the reference section are the most significant sources because this journal is the top most journal in the fields of history research in China. I found the link for the journal: History Research. We don't need to access the journal from Baidu Baike. The journal's content was accessible online starting the 4th issue of 1999. However, the two book reviews made by top scholars in Qing Dynasty research were in the first issue and the third issue of 1999. Therefore, there's no link to the content of the issues. If you think it will help, I'll ask professor Guo to send photographs of the two issues with reviews for his book.

The other two non website references: #8 is a book with ISBN. If you need photograph, I can send it to you. #3 is the record for the prestigious Academic prize Professor Guo's book won. Let me know if you need photograph for the prize certificate.

You also mentioned, Asia Pacific Daily (亚太日报): "Asia Pacific Daily was launched by Xinhua News Agency's Asia-Pacific Regional Bureau."-Asia Pacific Daily. Xinhua News agency is run by the Chinese government. Reliable?" The newspaper headquartered in Hongkong has a looser ideological control. Professor Guo's collection of speech was ordered by The Commercial Press (a top publisher in mainland China) a few years ago, but the recent year's tightening of censorship delayed the publication of the book. Professor Guo had to switch to a publishing house in Hongkong, therefore, the book reviews were also published in a Hongkong newspaper. I think Asia Pacific Daily is a more liberal source and credible.

I'll read WP:NPOV again word by word. If I have questions, can I ask you? I really appreciate your help and I look forward to learning from you.

Hongying LiuStoptosmellroses (talk) 19:43, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

@Stoptosmellroses:Hi, I have made a few edits on your draft, I have also found this source online, this probably still is a questionable source. Honestly, there is still a chance that your subject is simply not notable enough. If you have any questions, feels free to ask me about them. What is your relationship with Guo Shiyou? Justiyaya (talk) 01:09, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Trouted

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE 128.76.206.223 (talk) 11:55, 3 June 2021 (UTC) stop deleting it! you think you own knowlengde?! and deside what people should and should not know? it is and insult to the history of weapons manufacturing, so change it NOW

@128.76.206.223:Oh sorry, in the warning I posted, by non-constructive, I meant there is a NPOV and unencyclopedic tone issue with your edit, that was a bad warning, sorry about that. Anyways, I don't think that "Not that many people seem to know, that Denmark was the first country in the WORLD" belongs in an encyclopedia. If you need help, feel free to ask me by replying to this message, thanks! Justiyaya (talk) 12:00, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Non-consensual condom removal

Please read the sources. They don't say that women commit that act. The idea that women do it is pure speculation. That's why the lead and article as a whole is focused on men. 103.77.192.221 (talk) 15:08, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Yea that was probably a bad revert, I mainly did it because the one citation you added seemed questionable. Thanks for telling me on my talk page. Justiyaya (talk) 15:11, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

I didn't add a source, but thank you. 103.77.192.221 (talk) 15:16, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Yep, I'm wrong again, that was a reorder. Sorry about that. Justiyaya (talk) 15:18, 4 June 2021 (UTC)