User talk:Justin322

Panaca, Nevada

It's an article about a real town, with some actual content in the article. Do NOT replace with a redirect again. --Calton | Talk 01:17, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panaca, Nevada. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. --Calton | Talk 01:21, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have to cry about it.

Not crying about single thing. Just offering some advice to somone whose only contributions show a complete lack of understanding of basic policy or explicit directions. Frankly, the only complaining I'm seeing is from your end.

No one cares about the town, anyway. Don't you know anything notable that you can write about?

Since your total and brief contribution to Wikipedia has been to attempt to wipe out an existing article for a variety of bogus rationales, spare me the lectures about what productive things I should be doing. And speaking of being unproductive, blanking content is no-go, and continuing to do so for a valid article without some VERY good reasons WILL get you blocked. And this is not a threat nor "personal attack" (hint: "disagreeing with you" =/= "personal attack", as you seem to believe), but a well-founded prediction. --Calton | Talk 11:50, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For your edification: WP:3RR. Note that there is an exception for reverting vandalism -- actual vandalism, not your bogus rationale -- so this peculiar little crusade will not get you far. --Calton | Talk 17:52, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What IS your major malfunction? You've made only a dozen edits, and in that time you've been completely wrong in every one of your assertions. What makes you think I'm going to buy your most recent one? Oh, and one more revert and you can try explaining yourself to someone here. Prediction: it's not going to get you far. --Calton | Talk 18:45, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Troll"?

"Troll"? Don't make personal attacks, please. Especially not in edit summaries. Bishonen | talk 04:18, 24 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Final Warning

Consider this your final warning. If you continue disrupting Wikipedia to prove a point and making personal attacks, you will be blocked indefinitely. Thanks. alphachimp 21:49, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Your behavior since arriving at Wikipedia has been nothing but disruptive. You are indefinitely blocked. User:Zoe|(talk) 22:29, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]