User talk:JustEMV
Hi, just want to improve Wikipedia :)
Welcome!
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed that you were a member of the Project Peru group, and you have published Lizárraga’s biography. I’d like to say that is a great addition, as well as invite you to collaborate on an area of my interest. Over the last few months, I have published four biographies relating to figures from the Amazon Rubber boom. My personal favorite, and one you may find interest in, is Benjamin Saldaña Rocca. I have spread myself thin, and therefore seeking collaboration so I can add more information to Wikipedia about the Amazon rubber boom.
These are two drafts I have currently if you would like to check them out. Draft:Inca Mining Company
I also have a list of pages regarding the rubber boom that could use some editing or support, most of them dealing with Peru. Arawoke (talk) 00:50, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
From your mentor
[edit]Hello there, I am your mentor, and I just wanted to say how proud I am of you! keep on going!! -- Grapefanatic (Talk) 13:13, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, I appreciate it! JustEMV (talk) 15:36, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Albert Giesecke moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Albert Giesecke, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 20:27, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Great, thanks for the feedback! JustEMV (talk) 22:49, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Sourcing
[edit]Howdy hello. I see you've been adding info to Inca Empire, but you didn't provide a citation to a reliable source. It looks like you got the information from somewhere though, so I didn't outright remove the edits. But if you could go back and cite your sources that would be helpful. Thanks! CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 20:51, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yep, it's from the Spanish article, which in turn is based on the well-known Royal Commentaries of the Incas, but yes, I forgot to add the source, I'll do it right now. Thanks for the heads up! JustEMV (talk) 21:11, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Also, nice feature in the NYT :) JustEMV (talk) 22:02, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Machu Picchu at Good Article
[edit]Hi JustEMV, I've gone to review Machu Picchu at Good articles, but there are a few issues I would like to see addressed before I start.
A few citation needed tags have cropped up since you were last active, they need to be addressed ASAP as another reviewer may quickfail the article on seeing how many there are.
You should also replace sources to IMDB, YouTube and International Business Times with reliable sources.
Thanks, Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 12:31, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads-up! I’ll fix the issues and replace the sources right away. I'll let you know when everything's updated. JustEMV (talk) 14:33, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Rollinginhisgrave, I've addressed the citation issues and replaced the unreliable sources. Please let me know if you need anything else. Thanks a lot! JustEMV (talk) 16:51, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hey, I've spent an hour going through so far and I will be failing the article, I'm sorry. I'll post up the review and you can have a look why, but the sourcing issues were a lot deeper than I initially thought. I hope this doesn't discourage you, because it is a jumping off point for improving it. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 18:19, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the update. A highly detailed review would be very helpful for addressing the issues. I appreciate your feedback and will use it to make improvements. JustEMV (talk) 18:25, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hey, I've spent an hour going through so far and I will be failing the article, I'm sorry. I'll post up the review and you can have a look why, but the sourcing issues were a lot deeper than I initially thought. I hope this doesn't discourage you, because it is a jumping off point for improving it. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 18:19, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Machu Picchu
[edit]The article Machu Picchu you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:Machu Picchu for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rollinginhisgrave -- Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 18:24, 17 August 2024 (UTC)