Jump to content

User talk:JustAnotherWuBanger

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Really???????

Vote 204 RfA

[edit]

I'm going to have to ask you to re-write that vote. It is wholly innapropriate. If your personal attacks aren't removed I will be lodging a formal complaint at ANI. RetroLord 07:59, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Again i'm going to ask you to completely remove all references to mental diseases, and anything that could be considered a personal attack. I'm considering reporting you to sock puppet investigations aswell seeing as you are a first time editor who heads straight to RfA. Stop it now. RetroLord 08:21, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

JustAnotherWuBanger I would suggest removing the part comparing opposes to people with paranoid schizophrenia, which is likely what retrolord was getting at. Retrolord, I would suggest you be more specific when you ask someone to remove a comment (as you did this time), sometimes it doesn't convey very well in text. --kelapstick(bainuu) 08:22, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RetroLord, You of all people need to learn about PA and incivility before your start throwing you weight around, especially telling people how to vote on RfA. Whoever is right or wrong, you are in no position to start admonishing or threatening others. I suggest you take Spartaz advice and step back for a while.Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:37, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kudpung its not as if you have a perfect record either. It is wholly innapropriate to defend a blatant troll on the grounds you have personal issues with me. RetroLord 08:49, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That's got nothing to do with it and it's partly the reason why I politely asked you to refrain from posting on my talk page. Trolls are trolls, and what defines a troll, is one that remains obtuse and refuses to understand that enough is enough. The last thing I would defend here is trolling. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:16, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Kudpung you have been asked repeatedly by several editors to drop this nonsense. Please do so, this account has been banned as it is a sockpuppetting troll. Do not defend their actions. RetroLord 03:18, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for obvious trolling. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Legoktm (talk) 08:27, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ohhh, gee willackers!. JustAnotherWuBanger (talk) 08:36, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JustAnotherWuBanger (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I forgot my OneMadScientist password. I have been the victim of vandalism and personal attacks by others (by Cullen328 etc) which I can prove, thus I reciprocated righteously. I did not cast the first stone and am the one who has been Wronged. So You can either Unblock this account (or JustAnotherWuBanga - :-) ) and I'll try to be "civil" or I will continue by being helpful to others here in other ways just like they have to me. This Offer Expires in 12 Hours JustAnotherWuBanger (talk) 7:56 pm, Today (UTC+7)

Decline reason:

'try' is not enough. And FWIW, we make any offers here, not you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:41, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JustAnotherWuBanger (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I forgot my OneMadScientist password. I have been the victim of vandalism and personal attacks by others (by Cullen328 etc) which I can prove, thus I reciprocated righteously. I did not cast the first stone and am the one who has been Wronged. So You can either Unblock this account (or JustAnotherWuBanga - :-) ) and I'll try very hard' (No one can guarantee more than that)' to be "civil" (+ I will not abuse any other accounts if this account is unblocked guaranteed) or I will continue by being helpful to others here in other ways just like they have to me. This Offer Expires in 11 Hours (Don't Let Pride Stop You Doing The Right Thing, That's Silly) Do you actually understand the full History Here ????????JustAnotherWuBanger (talk) 13:56, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Retribution-only account. Acroterion (talk) 15:43, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Talkpage access revoked due to threats, now removed. Acroterion (talk) 16:10, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]