User talk:JustAdamm

August 2020

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:38, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JustAdamm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't do anything i just sent message to Saqib about User:Praxidicae who taking money to do pages HERE when he said litearlly"" I'd get my money back in that case. Please stop editing the article in such a disruptive manner. Thanks. saidUser:Praxidicae" and Boing! said Zebedee blocked me!!!! JustAdamm (talk) 19:43, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your appeal has nothing to do with why you were blocked (abuse of multiple accounts), and if you believe what you wrote above means that Praxidicae and Saqib are editing in violation of WP:PAID, you don't have the necessary competence in English to edit here. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:51, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(edit conflict) You stated there that your original account had been blocked, which makes this one a block-evading sock. And while I'm here, your accusation that Praxidicae is "taking money to do pages" simply shows that your English is too incompetent for you to understand what Praxidicae said or for you to work here. I have now revoked your talk page access (which I intended to do when I blocked, but I forgot). The reviewing adming can reinstate it if they disagree with me. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:52, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! That was quite the mind meld we had there @Boing! said Zebedee:.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:54, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

:-) Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:56, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

i heard I got money for something. Would someone kindly deposit it into my bank account? Thanks. Praxidicae (talk) 20:37, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]