User talk:Jupitusese

re William H. Pryor Jr.

Your edits to William H. Pryor Jr. are out of line and I've removed them and requested that they be oversighted (removed from the historical record), which is an pain to have to do. Please see WP:BLP which is a policy and an important one which you need to get up to speed on. Bottom line is you need much much much better sourcing for such inflammatory and potentially libelous material. Herostratus (talk) 17:26, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Louise bours.PNG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Louise bours.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:34, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

Hello, Jupitusese. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

G4S article

I generally like pages that bring up the seedy side of commercial practices, as in Controversies surrounding G4S. However I am wondering if this page is appropriate on its own. You did a good job on the article. My question is whether it should exist on its own and whether others think it is neutral. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 17:46, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ah thanks, but this was mostly a spinoff of the main G4S article so I don't think I deserve as much credit as you're giving me there. I also agree it's good to get some outside opinions on neutrality, etc., so thanks for bringing it to the noticeboard

Jupitusese (talk) 17:52, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

In this edit [1]]

You added "The most common complaints against G4S related to lost property and poor communication but there were 48 complaints of assault, three of which were upheld, and two accounts of racial discrimination were upheld."

Ref says "Most common complaints against G4S related to lost property and poor communication but there were 48 complaints of assault, three of which were upheld. Two complaints of racism were partially substantiated"

That is not paraphrased enough. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:33, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing this out. Changed to this; hope it is paraphrased enough

Jupitusese (talk) 18:06, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question about another account

What is the connection between this account and the account Zumoarirodoka? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:46, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 13:57, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jupitusese. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]