User talk:Juliedohbigny

Welcome!

Hello, Juliedohbigny, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Mary Riddle. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Longhair\^talk 02:15, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of African-American aviators

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on African-American aviators requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —teb728 t c 04:11, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Evelyn Waldren, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enterprise, California (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Edith Foltz) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Edith Foltz.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Nice job on the article. Be careful about short paragraphs, however. Keep up the good work.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:50, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Categories

Hi Julie, and thanks for the contributions you are making to wikipedia. When you add subjects to categories, please take note that if an article is in a sub-category, then it is already in any 'parent' or broader categories by virtue of that. So for example, an article in Category: African-American female aviators should not also be added to the categories American female aviators, nor African-American aviators, because the first category is itself in those two categories. So the aim is to put it in the most specific category possible, as in that example. I hope that makes sense. Thank you, Melcous (talk) 10:20, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just looking further, this means you should revert the edits you have made to add all those who are already in the subcategory Tuskegee Airmen to the parent category African-American aviators. Thank you Melcous (talk) 10:32, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Melcous: This is not correct. See Wikipedia:Categorization/Ethnicity, gender, religion and sexuality ; these kind of categories, when they exist at all, are intentionally non-diffusing, because it creates a needless and misleading separation. (There was a very famous case involving moving women authors to a separate category; there should just be author categories, and if there's a separation by gender, then include articles in BOTH.)

That said, User:Juliedohbigny, I think many of the categories you've recently created aren't appropriate by the same guideline I cited. These aren't relevant distinctions in the fields you've created; the example here is not differentiating sportspeople by religion, because it very rarely matters. In the same way, while differentiating aviators by nationality might make sense, being a "female record holder" does not. Same with Chinese-American female aviators and the like; ethnicity shouldn't make somebody any better or worse at flying a plane. SnowFire (talk) 08:16, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh thanks SnowFire, yes I forgot about the non-diffusing categories. It is more complicated than I made it sound Julie, sorry. Still something worth paying attention to. Melcous (talk) 22:12, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Chinese-American female aviators

A tag has been placed on Category:Chinese-American female aviators requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DannyS712 (talk) 01:05, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sounder Bruce 00:40, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Neal Vernon Loving

Hi Juliedohbigny, sorry if I stepped on your toes in cleaning up the article. That wasn't my intent. I didn't notice that it was an article you had just created until after I had made some manual of style cleanup edits. Had I checked the history before editing, I would have seen that you were still in the process of building the article and I never would have just gone ahead and started editing. Again, sorry. Cmr08 (talk) 08:09, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Arthur Bogle

Hi, I just read your article Richard Arthur Bogle and found it very interesting. Thanks for adding it to the encyclopedia! Schazjmd (talk) 00:53, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

wow! you have done some amazing work over the last year! we will be hosting our editathon for African American history and Women's history of the pacific northwest in February and March. If you have any thoughts on articles that need improvement, please send them my way! Thanks for all you are doing! Bridges2Information (talk) 22:27, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marion Carlstrom for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marion Carlstrom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marion Carlstrom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lettler^hello 01:51, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]