User talk:Jujuzadeh

Question?

What do you mean by multiplayer only in the Diablo IV Wikipedia page? Cassiusor (talk) 23:20, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

the game is ran on online servers only Jujuzadeh (talk) 23:47, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

True but why not say "online-only" instead? Cassiusor (talk) 23:48, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

just did. thanks for the tips Jujuzadeh (talk) 23:49, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! Cassiusor (talk) 23:50, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please familiarise yourself with Wikipedia guidelines, specifically those on video game articles. That the game is online-only isn't important enough to be mentioned in the very first sentence. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 04:19, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why you take it out? Other wiki pages like destiny and the division has online in like the first sentence. Cassiusor (talk) 04:33, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, I know. Please familiarise yourself with Wikipedia guidelines. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 05:48, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Where can I find these Wikipedia guidelines? Cassiusor (talk) 16:47, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Diablo IV, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- ferret (talk) 23:36, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Stuart Percy, you may be blocked from editing. -- ferret (talk) 00:05, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2008 was wrong i was just changing it to 2012 Jujuzadeh (talk) 00:07, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Adshead123 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Adshead123. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 09:41, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]