Jump to content

User talk:Judy99

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Complete blanking of whole sections is considered vandalism. This is the first and only edit on Wikipedia that you have ever made. Please do not engage in vandalism. You can review your edit here: Vandalism edit.--ExclusiveAgent (talk) 17:16, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you believe that Reed has made worthy important contributions then you are free to add those items, fully supported by reliable sources, to the article. However, the information that you blanked from the article is fully supported by reliable sources. You are now an editor and as an editor you can add information, but you cannot simply blank out 90% of an article just because you don't like the what the fully reliably sourced information states about Reed or any other topic. Wikipedia is a collaborative effort and blanking out whole section just because you don't agree is not collaboration, but vandalism. Please work to make the article better, but don't remove reliably sourced information simply because you have a personal opinion about something. All information must be reliably sourced and the information that you removed was reliably sourced.--ExclusiveAgent (talk) 14:23, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Judy99. You have new messages at ExclusiveAgent's talk page.
Message added 02:52, 1 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

-- Patchy1 02:52, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Judy99 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Lerdthenerd wiki defender 15:03, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]