User talk:Judithreisman
May 2010
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Talk:Judith Reisman. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 5 albert square (talk) 10:35, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Defamation
[edit]I've seen you're request and will look into it, in the mean time please stop removing content, or you might be blocked Acather96 (talk) 10:36, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
- I've emailed the Wikimedia Foundation, please give me exact details and information on what 'defamation' has occured. Thanks, Acather96 (talk) 10:41, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
FROM JUDITH REISMAN TO WIKIPEDIA
Gentlemen: I am in another country right now and was informed that Wikipedia was again using people who are long time pornography and pedophile lobbyists to defame me. Jimmy Wales had to correct all this a few years ago and now its back. This site ridicules my scholarship and undermines my professional reputation (legally this is interference with advantageous relations). For example, the representative from the Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality in San Francisco who you pose as a credible source to assault my pristine child sexual abuse research, has sold its own home made child pornography to Hustler magazine while Wardell Pomeroy, their former "dean" is on record as soliciting funds from the Adult Video Association to film child pornography at the IASHS. Their BOOK, Meditations on the Gift of Sexuality is a picture book of students, faculty, staff and friends engaged in illegal sexual orgies (circa 1977) including what is clearly understood today as child pornography, and my research has exposed their "institute" as a bogus "scientific" establishment in great detail. The same facts apply to your other critic. I could go through your entire entry for the slanted coverage, libelous and trivialization of my findings but I simply demand that you remove my entry from your site. It is wholly untrustworthy. Thank you for your immediate attention to this issue, Judith A Reisman, PhD
Hello there
[edit]Hi, it seems that you might be the subject of one of our articles and are displeased with some of the contents. See Wikipedia:Contact us/Article problem/Factual error (from subject) for a general overview of ways to get problems fixed (as well as an email address). You can also mention specific problems on Talk: Judith Reisman if you want specific mistakes corrected.
The email address is info-en-q@wikimedia.org. The first thing you might be asked to do is to privately establish your identity. Toddst1 (talk) 16:27, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
ANI
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 15:59, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
