User talk:Jst007

Hello, Jst007. You have new messages at HexaChord's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

This is Jst007's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Just drop me a line... --jst 007 ² 20:04, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Archives

Archive 1

Image tagging for Image:Actgal300084.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Actgal300084.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot (talk) 08:05, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It would be appreciated if you would not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Praveen E.P. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. VivioFateFan ^{(Talk, Sandbox)} 07:20, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The page may be found here. VivioFateFan ^{(Talk, Sandbox)} 07:23, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Kunchako boban 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kunchako boban 1.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:06, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stubbing articles

Hi - I'm not sure why you tried to stub St. Antony's Forane Church the way you did... perhaps you should read WP:STUB on how to add stub tags to articles? Grutness...wha? 03:02, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Mike Doughney (talk) 02:19, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jism 2

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Jism 2, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Closedmouth (talk) 14:29, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Isabel Kaif.JPG

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Isabel Kaif.JPG has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[1][2]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because images on Wikipedia need to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License or another free license, which allow anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file, please understand that the vast majority of images found on the internet are not appropriate for Wikipedia. Most content on the internet is copyrighted and the creator of the image has exclusive rights to use it. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others - do not upload images that violate others' copyrights. In certain limited cases, we may be able to use an image under a claim of fair use - if you are certain that fair use would apply here, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list. If no fair use rationale applies, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Ian¹³ /t 22:22, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Isabel Kaif

A tag has been placed on Isabel Kaif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Jamie^☆S93 23:52, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator/Editor

How can i aquire an administrator or editor status in wikipedia?

That would be Requests for adminship. Adminship is a big task, so you'd have to hang around a long time (I'd say at least a year or so) to get to know the project inside and out. Participate in articles for deletion. Create articles. Promote something to good or featured article status. Don't mess up a lot, just take it easy. As for "editor status", you already had that the instant you logged in for the first time. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 23:20, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Veruthe Oru Bharya

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Veruthe Oru Bharya, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://in.rediff.com/movies/2008/aug/11ssv.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:46, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright concerns

Hello there. Please don't add content copied from somewhere to Wikipedia, unless the content is released under the GFDL or a compatible license. Doing this is plagiarism as well as violating the copyright of the creators. This could create legal problems for Wikipedia, and probably yourself. If in doubt, don't add the content. Thanks. – Toon ^(talk) 21:33, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Eva Cobo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Eva Cobo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. mboverload @ 05:07, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Eva Cobo.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Eva Cobo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Eva Cobo.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. mboverload @ 05:08, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wait

It appears that you are uploading images and claim that you made them yourself. However, they are extremely low resolution and do not appear to be made by you. Can you explain why you are not uploading the original image from your camera?

Thanks! --mboverload @ 05:36, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please stop uploading pictures to Wikipedia. You cannot take pictures which belong to other people, claim them as your own, and upload them. All of your photos are currently being marked for deletion because you have clearly violated Wikipedia's policies.

If you continue to add photos which clearly do not belong to you, and claim them as your own, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The359 (talk) 05:42, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eva Cobo

A tag has been placed on Eva Cobo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. The359 (talk) 05:44, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:EvaCoboDeGarcia.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This image appears to be a direct copy from http://hkmdb.com/db/people/view.mhtml?id=8782&display_set=eng. As a copyright violation, Image:EvaCoboDeGarcia.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:EvaCoboDeGarcia.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:EvaCoboDeGarcia.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:EvaCoboDeGarcia.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:EvaCoboDeGarcia.jpg]].

Also

Image:Eva Cobo.jpg: copyvio of http://www.jackiechanmusic.com/images/girls/Cobo/
Image:Isabel Kaif.JPG: copyvio of http://www.isabelkaif.com/pix/isabel_kaif.jpg
Image:Boman-irani.jpg: copyvio of http://www.iloveindia.com/bollywood/actors/boman-irani.html
Image:Deepak Tijori.jpg: copyvio of http://www.tribuneindia.com/2003/20030205/ncr5.jpg

Please note The359's 05:42, 8 September 2008 (UTC) warning above:[reply]

If you continue to add photos which clearly do not belong to you, and claim them as your own, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

— Athaenara ✉ 06:55, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shamili

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Shamili, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.indiaglitz.com/channels/telugu/article/41391.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:25, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Gopika.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Gopika.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. mboverload @ 01:33, 21 September 2008 (UTC) --mboverload @ 01:33, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

XAMPP Lite

Hi, i hav started building the page XAMPP Lite. i hav taken the details from the site http://www.apachefriends.org/en/xampp-windows.html. I want to place this link as reference in this article. How can i place the reference there. please help me.

Thanks

Hi, Thanks a lot for uploading various images. Your help has certainly improved wikipedia. Pls always upload images in commons, as you did in the case od Jayaram's image, in order to avoid future trouble over copyright status and all. Rock on..--Anoopkn (talk) 21:03, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Harihar_Nagar_2.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Harihar_Nagar_2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 00:53, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

This is the only warning you will receive. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to LollyPop. Say Headcheese!--hexa Chord ² 02:17, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:XAMPP lite 1.6.7 Screenshot.jpg)

You've uploaded File:XAMPP lite 1.6.7 Screenshot.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:45, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spam in Sweans

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Sweans, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Sweans is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Sweans, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 01:21, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Ileana D'Cruz.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ileana D'Cruz.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:51, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Sweans Technologies.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sweans Technologies.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:27, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:A Boyfriend For Christmas.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:A Boyfriend For Christmas.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:09, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do we know?

Hi, I was just checking through article 2 Harihar Nagar and found out that you have created it. Your user name make me remember one of my friends named Justing Sam Thomas from AWH Engineering College. I hope both are same. Visit me and check if you know me. Have a great time. WarFox (talk | contribs) 08:40, 10 September 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by WarFox (talk • contribs) [reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Harihar Nagar 2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Harihar Nagar 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 20:43, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Corporate 2 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Corporate 2 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corporate 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 18:28, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Indian National Congress, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 21:47, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:In Harihar Nagar.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:In Harihar Nagar.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]