User talk:Jshunter40

RE. London Irish

I see, we'll have to get a third party to write it. For the meantime, the current article must be removed immediately. It may well be sources, but it i inaccurate to the point where we are in breach of contract with sponsors etc. Please inform me when the article has been taken down completely, then I will work on getting a suitibly written article for the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.41.24.165 (talk) 15:53, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's not how it works on Wikipedia. If you want an article taken down, you have to take it to WP:AFD and let the Wikipedia community decide if it is to be removed or not. Because the article has sources and sufficient notability, it is highly unlikely it will be deleted. But I also doubt that the content of a Wikipedia page is likely to affect contracts in law. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 16:10, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RE: London Irish

We, London Irish Rugby Club, need the current article removed ASAP as it contains incorrect information, for which we could get into trouble for. We've been trying to get this new article up for months, removing 'promotional language' and presenting facts involving changing circumstances within the club. I can assure you that I have been through my friend, john's , work and find no fault with it. The fault is, however, that wikipedia currently presents wholly incorrect information about the club. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.41.24.165 (talk) 14:23, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Then I think you might have a WP:COI. You shouldn't be editing pages that you have a close interest in. If you are a member of London Irish, then there is a COI there. The current London Irish Amateur (I assume that is the page you are referring to) page has information in it that is sourced to WP:RS requirements for the info to remain there. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 14:28, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

London Irish Amateur

Thanks for contributing the new article London Irish Amateur. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable, by being clearly attributed to reliable sources. Please help by adding more sources to the article you created, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the material (see here for how to do inline referencing). Many thanks! PS. If you need any help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me.

Hello, I'm The C of E. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to London Irish Amateur because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 13:04, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to London Irish Amateur. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 13:19, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

3RR warning

Your recent editing history at London Irish Amateur shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Re:London Irish

The reason why I revert your edits is because they are written in a non-neutral and POV way. I would also like to ask, what do you mean by "we" in your comment to me? The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 11:18, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited West London Institute of Higher Education, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bill McGuire (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited West London Institute of Higher Education, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Simon Mason (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited West London Institute of Higher Education, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Andrew Walker and Andrew Marshall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jshunter40. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Mr John S Hunter

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Mr John S Hunter has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://staffprofile.usq.edu.au/Profile/Peter-Terry. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review — Diannaa (talk) 12:49, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Jshunter40! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, I want to nominate Professor Peter C Terry for entry, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sir or madam: I want to submit an update on my submission of Professor Peter Terry for a Wikipedia page as follows. NB He is the only person who qualifies for the WLIHE page as both an Alumni and 'former staff of some renown'. Further details, e.g. his degrees, can be submitted if needed.

Peter Terry is a Professor of Psychology, and Dean of the Graduate Research School, at the University of Southern Queensland. He has also attended 9 Olympic Games as a Consultant.

AWARDS: 2001 Elected Fellow of The British Association of Sport & Exercise Sciences; 2009 Elected Fellow of the Australian Psychological Society; 2011 Elected Fellow of the Australian Sports Medicine Federation; 2018 Overseas Fellow of the Royal Society of Medicine.

PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES: Past President of the Asian-South Pacific Association of Sport Psychology 2014-2018; Australian International Shooting Ltd. Team Psychologist 2010-12; British Bobsleigh Association Team Psychologist 1989-1998; British Canoe Union Team Psychologist 1994-1998.

ACADEMIC CAREER: 1984-2000 Professor of Sport Psychology West London Institute of HE/Brunel University College/Brunel University; 2000-present University of Southern Queensland.

REFERENCES: www.usq.edu.au/Pages/staff

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:35, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]