User talk:Jrr483

October 2010

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to the page סודרא. Blank pages can confuse readers, and are overall not helpful to the Wikipedia project; furthermore, blanking a page is not the same as deleting it.

If the article you blanked is a duplicate of another article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate revision. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please use the appropriate deletion process. - Happysailor 20:34, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page סודרא. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Wayne Olajuwon chat 20:38, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There's no need for an article with that title in the English Wikipedia. Since most closely related topic is Sudarium, I've turned it into redirect there. If you think anything needs tweaking, I'd suggest discussing it at Talk:Sudarium. —C.Fred (talk) 20:45, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Sudra is similar but very distinct from the Sudarium and requires its own separate page. While the Sudarium has connotations in the Christian tradition, the Sudra has its own references and understanding that is unique in the Jewish tradition although they are essentially the same garment. The Sudra also has nothing to do with the Shudra or Sudra in the Indian tradition. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jrr483 (talk • contribs)

Why? What is so distinct that it can't be covered in the Sudarium article? All things considered, it's better to have one article with more details than two bare stubs. —C.Fred (talk) 21:04, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For one, they have different names. Two, the Sudarium has become a word associated with the Church to describe a sweat cloth that one uses to wipe ones face with while in the Jewish tradition it is a kefiyah like worn by Arabs. They have the same origins and the Sudarium worn by Jesus was a keffiyah, but it has evolved into two separate things. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jrr483 (talk • contribs)

If I do create a separate page, what do you suggest I title it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jrr483 (talk • contribs)

I'd suggest Sudra (headscarf) or the like. (On a side note, do not add the {{talkback}} template when replying here: it's only a flag to indicate that there's a comment left elsewhere, and you've not made any comments on my talk page.) —C.Fred (talk) 22:21, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks JR (talk) 22:24, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Curtis Robertson Jr.

Hello Jrr483,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Curtis Robertson Jr. for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Pratikazamgarh (talk) 15:46, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nicholas Gibbs

Hello Jrr483,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Nicholas Gibbs for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TimothyJosephWood 18:15, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Nicholas Gibbs

added links pointing to Tom Wilson and Charles Faulkner

Charles McGruder

added a link pointing to Magruder

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jacob Rutstein has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jacob Rutstein. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:20, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete AFC comments from drafts. They should remain in the draft until the draft is approved. Maybe you didn't know that. Now you do. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:50, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacob Rutstein (May 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anarchyte was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jacob Rutstein and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:45, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Jrr483, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:45, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jrr483. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:IsaiahRothstein.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:IsaiahRothstein.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 21:46, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jrr483. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isaiah Rothstein has been accepted

Isaiah Rothstein, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 19:09, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]