User talk:Jpjohnsn
Welcome!
[edit]
|
Thank you
[edit]Thank you for reverting the vandalism in the Royal Canadian Air Cadets article. You are correct that English first, then French. Dreamy \*/!$! 16:31, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
The Minor Barnstar | ||
You deserve this. Dreamy \*/!$! 16:31, 25 August 2007 (UTC) |
"Shouting"
[edit]Because of the fact that we type to communictae, by CAPITALISING a word, it is considered shouting. Please do not do this again. Dreamy § 18:31, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Sorry Dreamy but you are incorrect. Capitalising whole sentences is considered shouting. Capitalising individual words is merely emphasizing the word. In addition, FORTRESS is properly rendered in all caps.CU L8R AV8R ... J-P 21:03, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
- That I know, about FORTRESS, but even capitalising one word is shouting. Dreamy § 21:24, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Re:Cadet Wikia line on Royal Canadian Air Cadet article
[edit]I removed the link, but banning is a last resort here, so it shouldn't be used yet. If it is re-added, just removed it and classify it as vandalism. Dreamy § 21:04, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Royal Canadian Air Cadets GA Sweeps Review: On Hold
[edit]As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria and I'm specifically going over all of the "Culture and Society" articles. I have reviewed Royal Canadian Air Cadets and believe the article currently meets the majority of the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, and I'll leave the article on hold for seven days for them to be fixed. I have left this message on your talk page since you have significantly edited the article (based on using this article history tool). Please consider helping address the several points that I listed on the talk page of the article, which shouldn't take too long to fix with the assistance of multiple editors. I have also left messages on the talk pages for other editors and related WikiProjects to spread the workload around some. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 07:55, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
- Have done edits in support of your suggestions. Let me know if these are what you are looking for so I can make any further changes. CU L8R AV8R ... J-P (talk) 18:11, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Notable people section on Royal Canadian Air Cadets
[edit]The reason why I considered those people not notable was because if they were notable, that Wikipedia articles be created for them. If you have any spare time, it would be great if you made those articles. All notable people should have their own Wikipedia article. :) --K.Annoyomous (talk) 02:13, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
June 2014
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Former ranks of the Canadian Forces may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- ! align="center" bgcolor="#004000" color=white | <span style="color: white">Canadian Forces<br> (Land Force Command (from 2011 Canadian Army),<br>Air Command (RCAF from 2011)</span>
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:07, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Jpjohnsn. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Royal Canadian Air Cadets
[edit]Royal Canadian Air Cadets has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:40, 25 December 2023 (UTC)