User talk:Jpate86

UFC 2009

Hello there. Verifiability, not truth, is required for information to be included on wikipedia. The section you've added may be true, but without some reliable sources to back it up, it can't be included. A forum is not a reliable source. Thanks! Fin ©™ 10:35, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again, verifiability, not truth, is required for information to be included on wikipedia. Just because something is a fact doesn't mean it can be included. You need a reliable source to back it up. Please read the two pages I've just linked to. Thanks! Fin ©™ 19:53, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Listen to me: you're the one that has to supply the source. You can't just add information, then say "you go find a source for it". The burden of evidence is with the adder of material, not the one who wants it removed. Please stop adding it without a source. Might be a good idea to read WP:OR too. Thanks! Fin ©™ 19:59, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Essentially, yes, you do. A reliable source has to report on it (something like Gamespot, IGN, Eurogamer, Joystiq etc). Thanks! Fin ©™ 20:16, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --aktsu ^(t / c) 19:54, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]