User talk:Josh1024/Archive Before/14-06-2013

Hi! Click here to return to the main talk page, this is an archive.

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Josh1024! Thank you for your contributions. I am Skamecrazy123 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Skamecrazy123 (talk) 18:09, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Josh1024, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Skamecrazy123 (talk) 18:10, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Teahouse!

	Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
	Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

Greetings Josh1024, and welcome to the Teahouse. If you have any questions, then please don't hesitate to drop me a message on my talk page. Happy editing! --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 01:12, 3 February 2013 (UTC) from: Skamecrazy123[reply]

Nomination of Syed Shahabuddin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Syed Shahabuddin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Shahabuddin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. E4024 (talk) 17:34, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of deletion templates

Please become more familiar with our criteria for speedy deletion before continuing to remove CSD templates. You recently removed one on Order of the Sword and Shield in conflict with WP:CSD#A7. The article has since been deleted.

Based on your comments on the articles's talk page, you should also familiarize yourself with our policies on Wikipedia:Proposed deletion too. Toddst1 (talk) 21:17, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Archive 13/06/13)

I am just adding in the references now just checking the layout to make sure it matches the wiki layout — Preceding unsigned comment added by JeffA87 (talk • contribs) 21:57, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for clarifying this Josh1024 (talk) 22:04, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have finished all the others and i am ready to go back to the first one but I can't get back to it with out editing what you have put in there. Is it ok to go back and finish up that link or is it going to get deleted again? please advise I have the reference and layout ready to go — Preceding unsigned comment added by JeffA87 (talk • contribs) 22:27, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I finished up the links and references. I will probably go back in tomorrow and ad some more references and links between names in the discriptions and other articles on Wiki. I changed the format/words of that article to take his name tricks away from his description because I thought that sounded like the promotional part the flag thats why I went into separating his effects from his discription. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JeffA87 (talk • contribs) 23:14, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can see that you have added your improved content to the page. In order for your article to receive fair treatment I will unreview it meaning another editor will review it and will decide if your article passed all appropriate Wikipedia policies. Hope this helps, Josh1024 (talk) 23:17, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Focus X

Hi, i have added citations to the article Focus X. I hope they are ok. The only thing is, i don't understand how to add the album cover on the page. Please could you explain? Thanks, Y45ed (talk) 23:05, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking my advice and improving your article. I personally can't help you with your question because I lack technical knowledge about this, but I know some who probably can, you could send Skamecrazy123 a message by clicking here. I will mark your article as unreviewed so that another editor can review it to make sure I haven't missed anything. If you have any more questions feel free to reply below, Josh1024 (talk) 23:26, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Josh1024, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Josh1024! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Teahouse!

	Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
	Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

Hey :) Welcome to the Teahouse, really glad you've joined us.

from: Ocaasi

The Teahouse Turns One!

It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!

	Teahouse First Birthday Badge
	Awarded to everyone who participated in the Wikipedia Teahouse during its first year! To celebrate the many hosts and guests we've met and the nearly 2000 questions asked and answered during this excellent first year, we're giving out this tasty cupcake badge. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

--Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:31, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Isoalloxazine

Dear Josh, I just added the article Isoalloxazine because it was not yet present in Wiki. I feel that Isoalloxazine deserves an article. I'll expand the article and put some references later (now I'm engaged in other writing). If there is a specific violation to Wiki rules, please let me know. All the best, Gianluca — Preceding unsigned comment added by GianlucaMolla (talk • contribs) 13:36, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol

Hi Josh, thanks for your help patrolling new pages. I reviewed one of your CSD tags and I've had to decline it. You see, you used the WP:CSD criteria A7 which is for "real person, individual animal(s), organization, web content or organized event" and not for molecules. It's very important that we stick to these criteria when using CSD because it's impossible for non-administrators to verify our actions which means we have to get it right the first time to maintain trust. Since everything on Wikipedia happens based on consensus, we must followed the established consensus at WP:CSD. Also, generally when tagging a page, it's only helpful to pick the most glaring issues to tag a page for. A page that is mostly tags with content hidden between them isn't very appealing to our readers. Anyway, thanks again for your help.--v/r - T P 20:22, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Goatskrieg

Hello, I have removed the speedy deletion tag you placed on Goatskrieg, as speedy deletion criterion A9 is only applicable to musical recordings (songs, albums, etc.), not to musicians or bands. A7 is the speedy deletion criterion that applies to musicians or bands that have no claim to notability. I think this article has a shot at qualifying for that criterion, so I have tagged it.

I have also removed the proposed deletion tag you placed on the same article, as proposed deletion is only for deletions that you believe are uncontroversial and the rationale you provided indicated you do not believe deletion of this article to be uncontroversial. If you believe an article's deletion may be contested by anybody, use the Articles for deletion process. Cheers, —KuyaBriBri^Talk 22:06, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]