User talk:Joseprzprz86

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Joseprzprz86, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Marco Guzman, Jr Chat 19:54, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Colonia del Valle, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Please stop knowingly adding peacock terms Marco Guzman, Jr Talk 03:15, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Colonia del Valle, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 19:33, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Colonia del Valle. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Colonia del Valle was changed by Joseprzprz86 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.881988 on 2011-09-27T19:40:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:40, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Colonia del Valle with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 19:44, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Colonia Del Valle (Mexico City)

Concerning your contribution, Colonia Del Valle (Mexico City), a page move cannot be done by simply copying and pasting the contents of a page into a new location, as such a process does not transfer the page's edit history and therefore violates the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC-BY-SA) license. As a violation of the page move process, Colonia Del Valle (Mexico City) needs to be temporarily deleted under the speedy deletion criteria so that the page you intended to move may be properly moved in a way that will preserve its edit history. Colonia Del Valle (Mexico City) has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If not, please refrain from editing either the page you intended to move or Colonia Del Valle (Mexico City) until the latter has been deleted according to Wikipedia's speedy criterion G6 (non-controversial housekeeping).

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Marco Guzman, Jr Talk 04:03, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Scapinno (Fashion House). When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Osarius : T : C : Been CSD'd? 21:15, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Scapinno (Fashion House)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Talk:Scapinno (Fashion House), to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Osarius : T : C : Been CSD'd? 21:18, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Scappino (Fashion House)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Scappino (Fashion House). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Scapinno (Fashion House). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Scapinno (Fashion House) - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Osarius : T : C : Been CSD'd? 22:30, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Adding GA tags to articles

Your addition of the "Good articles" tag to the Audrey Tautou article in this edit was inappropriate. Articles must be reviewed and meet certian criteria to be awarded a good article rating. If you think this article meets the criteria then you should follow the instuctions at Wikipedia:Good article nominations. Betty Logan (talk) 21:04, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

Hi. When you recently edited Psychédélices, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page En Concert (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mario Hernandez (Fashion House)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mario Hernandez (Fashion House) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 19:52, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Mario Hernandez (Fashion House). If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 20:05, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Mario Hernandez (Fashion House). If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 20:10, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Colonia del Valle

Hello Joseprzprz86. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Colonia del Valle, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 18:51, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Colonia del Valle, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Stop moving cited material. Marco Guzman, Jr Talk 00:15, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Colonia del Valle with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tiderolls 00:24, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE, DO NOT REMOVE CITED WORK

Please, do not remove referenced materials that are third-party and shed better light to understanding Colonia del Valle--as opposed to first-hand, anecdotal, accounts tainted with our own biases. If Reforma newspaper ever says that Colonia del Valle is one of the most prestigious neighborhoods; we will definitely add it. Until then, please refer from adding absolute nonsense about "prestige" and faux "luxury" wrongly attributed to a largely upper-middle class neighborhood with various social and financial problems. -- Marco Guzman, Jr Talk 00:35, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Jim1138 (talk) 00:35, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Again spoke with bases, Santa Fe a luxury zone has the same or worse ranking problems, both in service plubial, insecurity, economics of organization iclusive this week the Exelcior a mexican newspaper said holy faith was one of the most conflictive zones to living, so when you try to defend your arguments with bases.--Joseprzprz86 (talk) 00:42, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Colonia del Valle is not an article on Santa Fe. It's not an article on Colonia Polanco. It's an article on Del Valle neighborhood. It has been compared to Tepito and Colonia Doctores in third-party works. Where is your works citing that it's as "prestigious" (whatever that means) as other neighborhoods?-- Marco Guzman, Jr Talk 00:48, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So if you are going to put that things. Put all the truth same in that two zones ok? and ye you can put the problems but you can put all the staff about the government actions but with tath word you put the government in a ridicule and you can get problems--Joseprzprz86 (talk) 00:54, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to add the referenced material to those articles, please, be my guest. My response to your comments in regards to my fear of the Mexican government: NUTS!.-- Marco Guzman, Jr Talk 01:06, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Colonia del Valle

Hi, Joseprzprz86. For you to continue to edit here you need to be aware of a few things. When an editor removes cited content it is expected that they will explain their position. This is usually done on the article talk page. If that removal is contested, the editor does not revert the edit without discussion. To employ the "undo" function without an edit summary, as you did with the linked edit above, is tantamount to categorizing the reverted edit as vandalism. Please read WP:VANDALISM and understand how the edit you reverted does not meet any of the criteria set forth on that page. You also need to acquaint yourself with WP:Edit warring, in particular the three revert rule. I will watchlist this page in the event you have any questions. Tiderolls 02:06, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have added much content to this article without citing sources and it appears that some of your edits need to be corrected for grammar. I will be posting a message to the article's talk page and hope that you will join that discussion. Tiderolls 17:39, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Again you, well you are puting a mexican goverment in ridicules and tath is very bad thigh, if you'r gone to edit please put the thrut.--Joseprzprz86 (talk) 02:25, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am ridiculing nothing. If you're going to edit, please abide by the policies and guidelines of this prioject. Tiderolls 02:56, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Colonia del Valle, you may be blocked from editing. You are removing cited material. Also, the World Trade Center is not in colonia de Valle. Wikipedia is not a place to promote a subject. Marco Guzman, Jr Talk 19:08, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok you know what do what ever do you want with the page ok, for my part the only thing that I'll do is only see who destruct all the page and see who other Wikipedia editors in the next months shut your mouth, so for the part of the Mexican government stay hurt for part of Wikipedia with the exhausting try's to destroy the district page because you know what you think that you have all the reason and truth of everything without considering that you are not living in Mexico so ok this is over. Good bye.--Joseprzprz86 (talk) 19:34, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Joseprzprz86, go to the article talk page and explain how your content meets Wikipedia's standards for NOTABILITY with supporting RELIABLE SOURCES. If you continue to insist on your version of the article without discussion it is possible that you will be reported for edit warring (see WP:Edit warring). If you have questions regarding any of these guidelines, please ask. Tiderolls 23:18, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Colonia del Valle, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. With this edit you've shown that you are not a trust-worthy editor. I used the duck test to list all the IPs you've used to modify the article:

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:35, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Tiderolls 00:01, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alizée iTunes Essentials for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alizée iTunes Essentials is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alizée iTunes Essentials until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Izno (talk) 12:28, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

COPYRIGHTS

Please do not add and use copyrighted images/photos on Wikipedia articles. Only upload photos that you hold the copyrights (photos that you have taken yourself). For more information about image use policy and copyrights, please refer to Wikipedia:Image_use_policy. -- RMJJRM (talk) 08:56, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Marco Guzman, Jr

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mangoeater1000 I would appreciate if you could weight with your experiences with Marco Guzman, Jr if possible. Thank you and regards.-- Paniraja Upgraded! ^{Tag me!} 11:59, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Colonia del Valle, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Marco Guzman, Jr Talk 15:04, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

This is the only warning you will receive about ownership of articles, which you showed at Colonia del Valle. The next time you continue to disruptively edit Wikipedia, you will be blocked without further notice. OK enough with you and your socks. The next time you a) include that material without consensus and/or b) use a sockpuppet, either IP or account to do what you don't want to do with your account, and I am going to take you to WP:ANI. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 17:12, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Joseprzprz86, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 17:43, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Joseprzprz86. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:53, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]