User talk:Jordan431

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jordan431 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why in the hell am I blocked? I realize it says checkuser but I'm not related to anyone, anything on here. I'm a new editor and was trying to learn things about Wikipedia and you block me?? Is that how you treat your editors?? Huh Huh Huh???? I demand to be unblocked this instant

Decline reason:

"I demand to be unblocked this instant"? Nope. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:06, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Boing! said Zebedee:

Ok maybe not instant but I was unfairly blocked If you look at the Contributions there was no personal attacks or vandalism anything.--Jordan431 (talk) 17:09, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are not blocked for personal attacks or vandalism. And you are not a genuine new user. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:14, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

the block was uncalled for. However, If I vandalized or called someone a name then I can understand where a block is required but the thing is you are biting users whether they're new are not. I would appreciate it if this block gets further reviewed.--Jordan431 (talk) 17:18, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jordan431 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to be unblocked please

Decline reason:

You haven't addressed the reason for your block, which is that you are believed to be using multiple accounts, in violation of WP:SOCK. Yamla (talk) 17:37, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: I'm not using multiple accounts and I was unfairly blocked.--Jordan431 (talk) 17:41, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jordan431 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to be unblocked please I was unfairly blocked. And I did not use multiple accounts.

Decline reason:

No, no you weren't, yes you did, and talk page revoked. —DoRD (talk) 18:23, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.