User talk:Jonnyzhamat
Speedy deletion nomination of Latest films reviews
[edit]Hello Jonnyzhamat,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Latest films reviews for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ishdarian 06:38, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Reply
[edit]Because your "Latest Film Reviews" is WP:SPAM and spam links are not allowed here.----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 07:10, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
August 2013
[edit]
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to The Conjuring. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. STATic message me! 07:15, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at The Conjuring shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. STATic message me! 07:16, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit] Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or 
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:17, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Pleasant1623. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added, because it seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. --Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 07:29, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
LInks
[edit]I saw your note on User Talk:Pleasant1623, and wanted to let you know that the removals are actually 100% correct. Blogs basically never meet either WP:RS, our guideline for reliable sources, or WP:EL, our guideline for external links. Such links must be removed as soon as found. In other words, you can't link to your blog (or a blog you like) on Wikipedia--it's purely promotional. If you do it again, I'll block this account. Qwyrxian (talk) 13:07, 7 August 2013 (UTC)