User talk:Jonmax74

January 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Frank Gaffney. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 19:42, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Frank Gaffney. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
As per your comment on my talkpage, feel free to file at ArbCom if you would like to spend your time that way. DMacks (talk) 20:00, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

sock investigation

you are the subject of a sockpuppet investigation here LavaBaron (talk) 18:48, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]