User talk:JonatasM
hi
[edit]Hi. I found you in categories of users who can contribute in English and Portuguese. I myself am a native speaker of English, but I'm well on my way to learning Portuguese. Just check out my user page and talk page, and join in any of the discussions. To keep updated, you can even put a watch on my user page, which will automatically watch my talk page. :-) learnportuguese (talk) 19:30, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for edits.
[edit]Hi, JonatasM, I saw your recent edits to Heritability of IQ. You mentioned an issue that is mentioned in the professional literature on the subject, but the way you wrote your addition is not quite how the professional sources summarize the issue. Do you have sources at hand? You are welcome to check the source list I keep in user space for all editors to use to verify facts in articles on that subject. It may be that the article needs a revision along the line of what you just did (and I just rolled back, assuming good faith on your part), but such a statement should be carefully written to match the most up-to-date and authoritative sources. (That's because several of the sources point out that there are many conceptual errors people fall into as they consider the issue of heritability and what heritability means, so very careful wording is highly recommended in most of the professional sources.) Thanks for your participation. See you on the articles. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk) 17:24, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Hi WeijiBaikeBianji, my recent edition was just a reminder of content already mentioned earlier in the same article, after an assertion that seemed to not take it into account. See: "a 1996 statement by the American Psychological Association gave about .45 for children and about .75 during and after adolescence." It's an implication of this and an established notion in IQ literature that the influence of genes vs. the environment increases considerably from childhood to adulthood (from about .45 to in average .8), so studies made with children and claiming environmental influences should keep this in mind in their interpretation, that the environmental effects tend to considerably diminish by adulthood. I don't know if it's adequate for the article to mention it like I wrote, though. Feel free to change it or rearrange it. It's an excellent article by the way! JonatasM (talk) 06:03, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply. Thanks for double-checking on my talk page to make sure I saw it. Yes, the talk-back message worked as it should to let me know to bop over here. See you on the articles; it looks like we both like to find citations to sources for controversial statements. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk) 15:07, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)