Jump to content

User talk:Jonas Bronx

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Master

[edit]

Bayamón (12)

[edit]

Total Population: 224,044

Palmas Pueblo (2)

[edit]

Total Population: 30,071

Guaynabo (10)

[edit]

Total Population: 100,053

Premaster

[edit]

Dorado, Puerto Rico: 34,017

Pueblo of Dorado: 994
Dorado Urban Zone: 994
Espinosa: 3,222
Higuillar: 22,481
Dorado Urban Zone: 11,753
San Antonio: 6,456
Maguayo: 4,711
Rio Lajas Community: 0
Mameyal: 36
Dorado Urban Zone: 0
Rio Lajas: 2,573
Rio Lajas Community: 2,349

Nine areas/barrios/wards

[edit]
1
2

Mix

[edit]

A tag has been placed on The Merhoff Post requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:46, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think I care if it gets deleted or not? I am a writer from Puerto Rico, I write based on my knowledge of geography, local media, history and politics of Puerto Rico. Unlike you, you are not from here. In any case, . (Jonas Bronx (talk) 23:33, 20 September 2010 (UTC))[reply]
And I edit from my knowledge of Wikipedia policies regarding style and criteria for inclusion, and a website that set up shop less than a month ago, which does not appear to be mentioned anywhere else than this Wikipedia article, does not meet those criteria. I don't have to be from Puerto Rico to know when articles about Puerto Rico are poorly written and need to be cleaned up. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:00, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[edit]
  1. ^ Rios, Jannette (2010-07-22). "Ritz-Carlton puts on the Ritz with $231 million pact". Puerto Rico Daily Sun. Retrieved 2010-07-28.

Re:John

[edit]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Plastic Beach. Thank you. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:33, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Palmas Pueblo for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Palmas Pueblo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palmas Pueblo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 17:27, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]