User talk:Jon Hydro Jets

Jon Hydro Jets, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Jon Hydro Jets! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bangladesh Coast Guard, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Thomas.W ^talk 18:27, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I undid Spartacus's disruptive edits. I was just about adding sources and you undid mine. Now, the sources are added. Please take a look at them. Thank you. --Jon Hydro Jets (talk) 18:30, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're responsible for all edits you make, so if someone else removes unsourced information and you revert them and add it back in again, you're guilty of adding unsourced material. As for the sources "defencebd.com" isn't an official website, but a private one, and is of uncertain value, while the other site you added is a Wikipedia mirror, i.e. they just copy articles from Wikipedia (if you look at the bottom of their article you'll find that it says "Content from Wikipedia"), and thus can't be used as a reference at all, not under any circumstances. So look for better sources (see Wikipedia's reliable sources policy), especially for the second one... Thomas.W ^talk 18:44, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

-- Hello Thomas. I removed the contents that are supported by unreliable source, but keep the materials that are supported by source that is more reliable, which I just found on the internet.

Thank you.

--Jon Hydro Jets (talk) 19:04, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. I also hope you stop hounding me further. "I undid Spartacus's disruptive edits" is personal attack, I tell you once again read wp:npa. Spartacus! (talk) 04:33, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Spartacus. Let's both stop. Please, let there be no further edits on those articles. I will not hound you and you leave me along.

Peace out.

--Jon Hydro Jets (talk) 13:27, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good point

You have a very good point about Fyodor Smolov- he can't possibly have played for the national team when he was a one year old! I think that the dates are definitely wrong, but you can't insert "THIS IS WRONG" into the article (so sorry, but I had to revert that), you'd need to either change it so it's right (I don't know enough about Russian footballers or even just football) to do so myself. Perhaps trying asking another more specialist editor or the WP:Reference desk? jcc (tea and biscuits) 19:34, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Jon Hydro Jets! Thank you for your contributions. I am Jcc and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! jcc (tea and biscuits) 19:36, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Spartacus

The User Spartacus had been very disruptive. Please report here [1] about your concerns and valuable comments.Xenoverse9 (talk) 11:38, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Xenoverse9

I really do not think that I need to report him. Judging by his past and current actions; he will get himself blocked indefinitely sooner or later.

--Jon Hydro Jets (talk) 11:59, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sukhoi Su-35, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 12:35, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Siachen conflict, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Spartacus! ^t@lk 12:51, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Weapon systems of the Indian Navy does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Spartacus! ^t@lk 04:15, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Your recent editing history at Type 093 submarine shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Kendall-K1 (talk) 14:50, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Shulinjiang (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:48, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why am I blocked??

I am not a sock.

--Jon Hydro Jets (talk) 13:44, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]