User talk:Jollyroger666

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Jollyroger666, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:01, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gela Madhav Kunikade

The article Gela Madhav Kunikade has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It provides no context, and no references on which to establish notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lampman (talk) 15:44, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Natural History (How I Met Your Mother) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. WAYNEOLAJUWON 16:40, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tarkieb

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Tarkieb, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hang on}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:52, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Karobaar: The Business of Love

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Karobaar: The Business of Love, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hang on}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:53, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mr. Monk Goes To The Asylum

The article Mr. Monk Goes To The Asylum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This episode is not notable independently of the series, delete as per WP:FICTION guidelines.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fæ (talk) 11:27, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mr. Monk Goes To The Asylum for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Mr. Monk Goes To The Asylum, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Monk Goes To The Asylum until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Fæ (talk) 15:51, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mr. Monk And The Billionaire Mugger

The article Mr. Monk And The Billionaire Mugger has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sign of notability what ever it is.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Triwbe (talk) 16:09, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mr. Monk And The Billionaire Mugger for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Mr. Monk And The Billionaire Mugger, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Monk And The Billionaire Mugger until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kevinbrogers (talk) 03:22, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mr. Monk Goes to the Carnival

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mr. Monk Goes to the Carnival, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. noq (talk) 18:33, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Monk Goes to the Carnival

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Mr. Monk Goes to the Carnival, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Mr. Monk Meets Dale the Whale. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:32, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Palkon Ki Chhaon Mein, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 15:34, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at The A.B.C. Murders, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Please use those edit summaries. Mr.Magik-Pants (talk) 12:45, 4 August 2012 (UTC) Mr.Magik-Pants (talk) 12:45, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Your last edit did not go through due to an edit conflict. Quis separabit? 16:18, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why you add a lot of text then remove it. Given the warning you already received last August re disruptive editing perhaps you should use the sandbox. Quis separabit? 16:47, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The A.B.C. Murders may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Poirot has two doubts in his mind: 1] Why would ABC write to him instead of the Scotland Yard or any reputed newspaper? 2] Why did a meticulous man like ABC misspell Poirot's address on the Churston letter? After a

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:03, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Black Coffee (novel), it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. 25 edits for this? -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 14:01, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]