User talk:Jojojohnson2

Why am I being blocked as a sockpuppet?

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Jojojohnson2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

173.58.237.48 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Jojojohnson2

Blocking administrator: MBisanz (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jojojohnson2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

why have I been blocked? I am certainly not a sockpuppet, I only have one account. There must be some mistake

Decline reason:

Be that as it may, your edits such as [1] are grossly disruptive. Sandstein 08:37, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jojojohnson2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Disruptive? There was an agreement to include the BJCP on the talk page, the editors reverting me edits are not abiding by the agreement: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Beer_style

Decline reason:

Per WP:DUCK, as outlined at [2] it seems clear that you are either the same person who has operated several prior accounts, or you were directly recruited by him to edit as a proxy for him. Neither is allowed at Wikipedia. Jayron32.talk.contribs 18:33, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.