User talk:Johnsongwriter54

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Johnsongwriter54! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 230 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Anthony John Clarke - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 02:18, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd love to add some references but am struggling to find anything suitable. I do know Anthony John Clarke because I too am involved in the UK folk scene but, despite being well-known, finding articles about him that aren't, effectively, advertisements is proving difficult. I have also added pages about local musicians Tom Doughty and Kirsty McGee and am finding the same problem. I promise to keep my eyes open though! Johnsongwriter54 (talk) 11:25, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anthony John Clarke

The article Anthony John Clarke has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Clearly, the subject exists and the article could be referenced to his own site. However, there seems to be a distinct lack of reliable sources, such as national newspapers, who devote coverage to the subject.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - Jarry1250 ^{[Weasel? Discuss.]} 20:59, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]