User talk:Johns17ba

June 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from TOMS Shoes. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. OlYeller21^Talktome 17:46, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Toms Shoes, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Please make yourself familiar with WP:V before making such an edit again. 'Because the link doesn't work' is not a suitable reason to blank content. The article existed and just because the link doesn't currently work doesn't reverse that fact. OlYeller21^Talktome 13:30, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

After reviewing the incident again, I can't help but think you may have a motive here. With one dead link, you removed an entire paragraph, including the other three references that supported the short paragraph. Can you help my understand what you're attempting to do here? OlYeller21^Talktome 14:44, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:09, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Toms Shoes, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. The content has four references from reliable sources. Removing sourced content is not acceptable. OlYeller21^Talktome 18:33, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

— Berean Hunter (talk) 10:27, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]