User talk:Johnred9474

Welcome!

Hi there, Johnred9474, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm a regular contributor here, and when I notice on the recent changes log that a new editor has registered, I like to send them a welcome message - that's how I ended up on your talk page.

If you've never edited here before, there are a few useful links that you might want to look at, designed to help newcomers learn the ropes:

Here are a few features of Wikipedia that I find particularly helpful:

If you leave a message on a talk page, you can sign it with four tildes (~), which will automatically produce your name and a date stamp when you save the page.
The "Show preview" button allows you see what your post will look like before you save it - that way, you can proofread what you've written and not have to go back and correct spelling mistakes, failed links, etc.
You can create a watchlist for yourself that will keep a record of any changes made to a page that interests you.

There are plenty of other features and facets of Wikipedia, many of which I probably haven't even discovered myself, so have fun looking around and finding them.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! - Tapir Terrific, 04:44, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Kristin Chenoweth Galinda.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kristin Chenoweth Galinda.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:08, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of L'Oréal Kids

An article that you have been involved in editing, L'Oréal Kids, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L'Oréal Kids. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 23:20, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:StephanieJBlock.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:StephanieJBlock.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (ESkog)^(Talk) 19:17, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Courtney Corey has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 19:34, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Courtney Corey. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. -- Gmatsuda (talk) 11:38, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Courtney corey

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Courtney corey, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Courtney Corey. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:41, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Johnred9474. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Gmatsuda (talk) 12:19, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Courtney Corey

A tag has been placed on Courtney Corey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 20:09, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Courtney Corey

I have nominated Courtney Corey, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Courtney Corey (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Nancy ^talk 11:59, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Courtney corey

A tag has been placed on Courtney corey, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 21:42, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

High-resolution versions of non-free images

Hi, John. I noticed you've recently uploaded high-resolution versions of File:Theboldandthebeautifullogo2004.jpg and File:Theyoungandtherestlesslogo.jpg. These images, being copyrighted logos of television programs, are non-free content, and so their use here must follow the non-free content criteria. In particular, the third criterion states, in part, "Low- rather than high-resolution/fidelity/bit rate is used." In other words, we do not need or want high-resolution versions of non-free images here. If you upload non-free images in the future, please upload low-resolution versions. Thank you for your cooperation, and please let me know if you have any questions. —Bkell (talk) 02:02, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ChelseaKrombachfirstalbumLookfortheSilverLining.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ChelseaKrombachfirstalbumLookfortheSilverLining.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — ξ ^xplicit 00:28, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ChelseaKrombachsecondalbumProfile.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ChelseaKrombachsecondalbumProfile.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — ξ ^xplicit 00:28, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]