User talk:JohnnyCanuck2

Your note[edit]

I haven't heard anything further from Mangojuice yet, so I don't know the state of things with the article. I'll check in to find out. Regarding the block, I didn't know about that either, but I'll ask Curps to clarify and consider reversing the block. Bearcat 22:57, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

~~Please do not vandalise user talk pages with unsubstantiated allegations of sockpuppetry.~~ --Sam Blanning^(talk) 23:18, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I see you admit to being a sockpuppet of an indefinitely blocked user. Contest your block by bringing it up with the blocking admin, not by creating sock accounts. This account has also been blocked. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 23:20, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In case you didn't know already, you can still log in as JohnnyCanuck and edit your own user talk page, leaving {{unblock}} to alert an administrator to the fact that you have good reason to be unblocked. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 23:26, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Elliot Frankl[edit]

I left you a response at User talk:JohnnyCanuck. Mangojuice 23:32, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1, 2, 3...[edit]

Just a bit of friendly advice...you're really not doing yourself any favours by making new allegations of sockpuppetry against pm_shef while this is under debate. I'd advise you to just leave him alone and refrain from making political allegations; if you post another personal attack against him then I'll be the one to block your next new account. You can still edit your own user page and talk page from your original account; I strongly suggest you do that rather than creating another puppet account. Bearcat 23:35, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]