User talk:Johnniestallions

Speedy deletion of Johnnie stallions

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ contribs} 07:36, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved, as you did at Johnnie stallions. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ contribs} 07:50, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Johnnie stallions. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ contribs} 07:51, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1. Don't recreate vanity articles, or you can get blocked. 2. It's already clear that it's a total hoax. So just stop. JuJube (talk) 09:02, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
  The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. JuJube (talk) 09:47, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of When Going Home

A tag has been placed on When Going Home requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 09:44, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of The Real Thing (The Taylor Swift Song (CD Version

A tag has been placed on The Real Thing (The Taylor Swift Song (CD Version requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 09:44, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Dial And Drive

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Dial And Drive, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Dial And Drive is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Dial And Drive, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 10:00, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I Saw God Today

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Eric444 (talk) 06:39, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of What if we fly

A tag has been placed on What if we fly, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mdebets (talk) 00:13, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're Gonna Miss This

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to You're Gonna Miss This. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Eric444 (talk) 02:03, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31h in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. seicer | talk | contribs 02:12, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Cagle

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Chris Cagle. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Eric444 (talk) 04:20, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to James Otto. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 04:16, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Dreadstar † 05:33, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Jinnyjohnsonmusic for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 02:39, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]