User talk:Johngranger71

April 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to BrewDog have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: BrewDog was changed by Johngranger71 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.902991 on 2023-04-15T00:28:16+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:28, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I reverted your recent edit to Brewdog:Controversies section as it didn't seem relevant. Neither does it seem particularly worthy of inclusion anywhere within the page. Perhaps if you want to re-submit it, either add in some context in the edit summary or provide some justification on the talk page? Regards Stroness (talk) 09:27, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Allan McGregor, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:58, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are displaying inaccurate details on this page, I was speaking with his wife today. I am pretty sure his wife and Allan knows high tall he is and how many goals he has scored both facts are wrong on this wiki page. If you would like to speak direct reach out to me. I need to get this updated so it displays accurate results, as you should not lie showing inaccurate results. Alternatively I will have to report this to Wiki as flanging inaccurate facts about an individual Or we can go legal with this. Reach out to me by tomorrow or I will have no choice but to report you for falsifying results. I am also setting up a new website as well, and I will be flagging this as a Fake Wiki page. If you continue to use fake results Johngranger71 (talk) 18:30, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:EM Dairies

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:EM Dairies, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 13:17, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Johngranger71. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 13:17, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: EM Dairies (September 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by GrabUp were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:EM Dairies and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GrabUp - Talk 13:21, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Johngranger71! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GrabUp - Talk 13:21, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Deb (talk) 13:55, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deb, I dont see why you have blocked me. One indavidual on wiki has used the wrong details about an indaviual. His wife asked me to update this, and I was told I could not update this.

If I am blocked so be it. I just dont feal that is a professional repsonse when I am trying to get familiaer with this platform. Johngranger71 (talk) 14:05, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please just take the time to read the guidelines and you'll understand where you are going wrong. Then you can withdraw your ill-considered threat and perhaps be allowed to edit again. Deb (talk) 14:21, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How do I withdraw what you make refferance to? Happy to start with a clean slate if possibile. If not have a wonderful day. Johngranger71 (talk) 14:27, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Johngranger71 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologize for making a legal threat regarding the age information. I now understand that legal threats are not appropriate on Wikipedia. I would like to resolve this matter through Wikipedia’s normal dispute resolution processes and respectfully ask to be unblocked. Johngranger71 (talk) 14:43, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

As you have withdrawn the threat and committed to not making legal threats in the future, I will remove the block. Courtesy ping to Deb. 331dot (talk) 15:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, you are unequivocally withdrawing your legal threat? 331dot (talk) 14:49, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I unequivocally withdraw the legal threat, and I apologize for making it. I now understand that legal threats are not appropriate on Wikipedia and would like to move forward by following the proper dispute resolution processes. Thank you for your consideration. Johngranger71 (talk) 14:57, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: EM Dairies (October 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:EM Dairies and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:53, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:EM Dairies

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:EM Dairies, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:54, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 16:42, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]